This may be a stupid question...
#2
TECH Veteran
The power loss is the reason. In order to run a supercharger at 20psi+ boost levels at 3500rpm and lower you'd have to overdrive it heavily and the parasitic drag would be outstanding compared to running a turbo. Detroit Diesel many years ago ran both a turbo and a supercharger on the same engine
#3
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Temple, TX
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The main reason is Superchargers arent as efficient as turbos.. You would need to overdrive the hell out of a supercharger to make it as efficient as a turbo. Like Zippy said, Detroit Diesel ran superchargers on all there "V" series engines, most of them still using turbo's in conjunction..
Piers Diesel experimented with a supercharger on a Cummins. It was so overdriven, that it was making 5 psi of boost at idle, and 40 psi at 3000rpms, which eventually led to its demise due to the head unit not being able to support that amount of boost..
Piers Diesel experimented with a supercharger on a Cummins. It was so overdriven, that it was making 5 psi of boost at idle, and 40 psi at 3000rpms, which eventually led to its demise due to the head unit not being able to support that amount of boost..
#6
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Drayden, Maryland
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I still work on those old Detroit's at my work. We rebuild 3-53,4-53, 4-71,4-71ti,6-71,6v-53,6v-71, and 6v-92. They all have roots style superchargers but the 6v-53, 6v-92, and the 4-71ti are turbocharged also.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Roach Coach
FUEL SYSTEMS
10
08-30-2015 10:06 PM
iregret
GM Parts Classifieds
3
07-27-2015 10:32 PM