Originally Posted by zero2sixT

You want to call swapping out the stock blower for, say a KB a, "bolt-on"? Cool, w/e. I've known a 347 that put down over 900 with a f1a.



Lol. Says the guy running a pushrod engine. How smart was the guy who bought the last 3v stang produced? Are you planning on dumping that pos pushrod boat anchor, and getting smart?

I remember when ford went to the mod motors. Chevrolet still ran the LT-1 in the fbody's. All the **** talking from the ford guys about pushrod engines are junk, ohc is the way to go...blah blah blah. GM came out with ls based engines. Over 10 years later, Ford finally has an answer. And here we go again with the same dipshit arguement...

Meanwhile, people are making 1k hp with junkyard, LS based v8s. Hmmm.

Originally Posted by gnd111

LOL but truth is what it is. In base form (NA) an OHC is more efficient than an OHV and the engineers have proven it...

Originally Posted by LS1FREEK

IDK about ya'll, but I dont wanna buy 32 springs and 4 camshafts every time I wanna do a cam swap...

Originally Posted by AKlowriderZ71

You don't need a cam swap with these Furds. You just need a TUNE!!

‪2011 Mustang GT with Lund cammed tune‬‏ - YouTube

Originally Posted by gnd111

LOL but truth is what it is. In base form (NA) an OHC is more efficient than an OHV and the engineers have proven it...

Originally Posted by LS1FREEK

IDK about ya'll, but I dont wanna buy 32 springs and 4 camshafts every time I wanna do a cam swap...

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71

The base peromance thing is a mute point. Anyone who gives two ***** about performance doesn't leave it stock and time and again the ls motors provide more bang for the buck than any other platform. Why do you think ls swapped fox body is so damn popular?

I like what Ford is doing but some of you need to let go of fords ******* a little.