4.8 5 speed track time (new best in the truck)
12-21-2009, 03:31 PM
#14
Banned
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wouldnt worrry about anything with street tires. Just dont get any wheel hop.
For comparison my 4.8L a4 '05 sierra rclb ran 14.90 @ 92 mph back in wisconsin. da was less than sea level.
Mods were catback, no cats, basic tune and 4.56 gears. We should run them for comparison. Im out in Mesa
For comparison my 4.8L a4 '05 sierra rclb ran 14.90 @ 92 mph back in wisconsin. da was less than sea level.
Mods were catback, no cats, basic tune and 4.56 gears. We should run them for comparison. Im out in Mesa
Last edited by dug; 12-21-2009 at 03:38 PM.
12-21-2009, 06:50 PM
#15
SPAM HUNTER
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What did your 6 liter 4l80e combo run, there are a few on here running low 13's and high 12's, Whats your deal?
So **** you buddy
1-2 shift, i get hop, caltracs should fix that in the future.
Also im running 4.10s so you'll have a little for gear, and i bet you can launch your better.
So **** you buddy
I wouldnt worrry about anything with street tires. Just dont get any wheel hop.
For comparison my 4.8L a4 '05 sierra rclb ran 14.90 @ 92 mph back in wisconsin. da was less than sea level.
Mods were catback, no cats, basic tune and 4.56 gears. We should run them for comparison. Im out in Mesa
For comparison my 4.8L a4 '05 sierra rclb ran 14.90 @ 92 mph back in wisconsin. da was less than sea level.
Mods were catback, no cats, basic tune and 4.56 gears. We should run them for comparison. Im out in Mesa
Also im running 4.10s so you'll have a little for gear, and i bet you can launch your better.
12-21-2009, 06:59 PM
#19
SPAM HUNTER
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
16.3 i think, and im sure with a better tire and if i was a little more aggressive with the launch and shifting i could do alot better, but why hurt it if i dont need to.
12-21-2009, 07:09 PM
#20
SPAM HUNTER
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
204/218 int/exh @ 0.05" duration
0.551" / 0.547" int/exh lift
117 LSA
I have the 02 ls6 cam as well to put it into perspective, its a horrible choice for n/a haha top end is great! Low end sucks.
0.551" / 0.547" int/exh lift
117 LSA
I have the 02 ls6 cam as well to put it into perspective, its a horrible choice for n/a haha top end is great! Low end sucks.