silver-mod-o

iTrader: (15)

24.5 degrees of timing is weak... 30+ is more like it.

And "I'm getting x amount of timing" doesn't say much, you need to look at peak tq timing, WOT AFR, AFR/timing at the hit etc... Lots of different aspects except WOT timing.

GMCtrk

iTrader: (27)

I was just pleased to see no KR. Wideband should go in soon.

2005 Silverado

iTrader: (19)

I glanced through and didnt see it, what is your rear gearing?

GMCtrk

iTrader: (27)

4.10s

dlt76028

iTrader: (13)

wow that sucks, but when you went to the track first didn't you have a wheatley tune? and now you do the tuning?

GMCtrk

iTrader: (27)

I haven't done much of anything with the tune yet, haven't had time. Just added some fuel and a little timing, that's it. Once I get the AFR at WOT set up how I like it, I'll see how much timing the motor can take without KR.

dlt76028

iTrader: (13)

Well theres a difference then. tuned vs not tuned.

Spoolin

iTrader: (8)

And you put the stock cats BACK on?? Is that right? And I think you'd better learn to drive the truck more consistently, it's not hard to launch a truck and get traction, just don't got WOT until the 60 foot mark and work your way down from there.

brent5631

iTrader: (7)

You definitely should have gone faster.
My last track run i had;
lq4, 80E, LT's, stock catback with cutout open, CAI, 3.42, open diff, 87 Oct.
This is all in a 99 ECSB

And i went best of
60 = 2.2 ish
1/4 = 14.57
mph = 96.8

So i think you should have done a lot better than that.

nonnieselman

iTrader: (10)

id like to see some logged runs with AFR to see how its running right now, like it did at the track. Then work on the tune and go from there.

I went from a stalled 60E to a stock TC 80E and picked up 1 tenth and 2 mph.