NA stock block hemi runs 12.88@107
05-01-2007, 09:16 PM
#181
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: GO PACKERS!!
Posts: 1,234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by XLR8NSS
I'm thinking we are all gonna have to meet up at the track somewhere and have a PT.net race. 
05-01-2007, 09:16 PM
#182
Originally Posted by kkd60
He already said he had heads on the truck. 4950lbs and 107mph equates to 558 crank hp. Using the same calculator for the silverado at 4500lbs and 106mph equates to 494 crank hp. We all know these numbers are not accurate but it does show the hp that the motor is making. My argument isnt on the et's or the weight, its the fact that the new mopar motors are making as much if not more than the infamous ls motors. Speaking of excuses,
"he is running STOCK heads AND shortblock, just bolt ons, stall and cam AND 50 less cubes" Are these the excuses I can expect to hear as we continue to improve. Remember "YOU chose to buy the truck" with less cubes.
"he is running STOCK heads AND shortblock, just bolt ons, stall and cam AND 50 less cubes" Are these the excuses I can expect to hear as we continue to improve. Remember "YOU chose to buy the truck" with less cubes.
We chose to buy the trucks with less cubes and its STILL faster then your stroked H/C specimen you all speak of.
Im beating my head up against the wall here, Im done, these threads are the same song and dance. I dont think Ill be impressed with what the Hemi has to offer until there is a good tuning solution and even then I still believe the GenIII/IV motors will be ahead, but whatever, the fabled Hemi cant be beat. Have fun with your trucks, get back to me when a street driven Hemi gets in to the 10s.
If I ever quit working 70+ hour weeks Ill have my **** back up and running and would be more then willing to run any Hemi in/near TX and my truck is an extended cab Z71 on 35s, but the only excuses Ill be hearing are from the Hemi owner
05-01-2007, 09:19 PM
#183
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: GO PACKERS!!
Posts: 1,234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
No excuses he asked how we are saying the dodges are slow and thats my answer. So ya'll are comparing a stroked 5.7 to a stock longblock 5.3 with a cam in it?
We chose to buy the trucks with less cubes and its STILL faster then your stroked H/C specimen you all speak of.
Im beating my head up against the wall here, Im done, these threads are the same song and dance. I dont think Ill be impressed with what the Hemi has to offer until there is a good tuning solution and even then I still believe the GenIII/IV motors will be ahead, but whatever, the fabled Hemi cant be beat. Have fun with your trucks, get back to me when a street driven Hemi gets in to the 10s.
We chose to buy the trucks with less cubes and its STILL faster then your stroked H/C specimen you all speak of.
Im beating my head up against the wall here, Im done, these threads are the same song and dance. I dont think Ill be impressed with what the Hemi has to offer until there is a good tuning solution and even then I still believe the GenIII/IV motors will be ahead, but whatever, the fabled Hemi cant be beat. Have fun with your trucks, get back to me when a street driven Hemi gets in to the 10s.
05-01-2007, 09:35 PM
#184
On The Tree
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But THAT 12.4 5.3 is faster than alot of cammed 6.0 rc trucks. Not every cam only 5.3 runs 12.4's. Same as the dodges, there are some less modded trucks that are fast. So lets use my truck for the Hemi example, looks like the chevy isnt up to par, lol
05-01-2007, 09:44 PM
#185
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
Ill have my **** back up and running
Classic Chevy there is a 10 second truck on blocks under every tree in Texas LOL
OMG I think I peed a little!
Last edited by hemiwoods; 05-01-2007 at 09:50 PM.
05-01-2007, 09:49 PM
#186
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by kkd60
He already said he had heads on the truck. 4950lbs and 107mph equates to 558 crank hp. Using the same calculator for the silverado at 4500lbs and 106mph equates to 494 crank hp. We all know these numbers are not accurate but it does show the hp that the motor is making. My argument isnt on the et's or the weight, its the fact that the new mopar motors are making as much if not more than the infamous ls motors. Speaking of excuses,
"he is running STOCK heads AND shortblock, just bolt ons, stall and cam AND 50 less cubes" Are these the excuses I can expect to hear as we continue to improve. Remember "YOU chose to buy the truck" with less cubes.
"he is running STOCK heads AND shortblock, just bolt ons, stall and cam AND 50 less cubes" Are these the excuses I can expect to hear as we continue to improve. Remember "YOU chose to buy the truck" with less cubes.
05-01-2007, 09:54 PM
#187
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by hemiwoods
LOL !!!!!!!
Classic Chevy there is a 10 second truck on blocks under every tree in Texas LOL
OMG I think I peed a little!
Classic Chevy there is a 10 second truck on blocks under every tree in Texas LOL
OMG I think I peed a little!
05-01-2007, 09:58 PM
#190
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by hemiwoods
Now thats just mean!