Times for a 2000 v6 fullsize
#31
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: gonzales, louisiana
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RandomHero here is the sound clip of my truck.
http://s246.photobucket.com/albums/g...olbystruck.flv
Listen to it.
http://s246.photobucket.com/albums/g...olbystruck.flv
Listen to it.
#33
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 3,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good runs but you got a ways to go, I ran 15.1@88 in my rcsb 01' Silvy with a 4.3L N/A. That was a good running truck for what it was. I posted up a long time ago what mods I had on it to get there.
#34
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RandomHero here is the sound clip of my truck.
http://s246.photobucket.com/albums/g...olbystruck.flv
Listen to it.
http://s246.photobucket.com/albums/g...olbystruck.flv
Listen to it.
Sounds like my wife's impala when the cats blew out
If you want better times, just do a V8 swap. I went from the 4.3 to the 4.8 (wish I'd had gone to at least the 5.3 now), and it's like night and day...unless you've really got your heart set on that whole fastest n/a 4.3 thing.
#35
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 3,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds like my wife's impala when the cats blew out
If you want better times, just do a V8 swap. I went from the 4.3 to the 4.8 (wish I'd had gone to at least the 5.3 now), and it's like night and day...unless you've really got your heart set on that whole fastest n/a 4.3 thing.
If you want better times, just do a V8 swap. I went from the 4.3 to the 4.8 (wish I'd had gone to at least the 5.3 now), and it's like night and day...unless you've really got your heart set on that whole fastest n/a 4.3 thing.
#36
TECH Veteran
With about the same fuel milage and almost 100 more hp I'd pick the 4.8L anyday. The 4.3L can be made to run very hard with boost or nitrous, but N/A the 4.8L is much better overall.
#37
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
i have had both, with both mildly built, and the 4.3 was great in my s-10, but it wasnt very heavy. it surely wasnt making the power this 4.8 can, i dont have many mods in it so far, and its well over 300+rwhp.... the 4.3 would not see that n/a without a complete bottom up build.... and it didnt sound very sexy either...plus parts are very expensive for the 4.3....
#38
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not picking but I'd take a 4.3L over a 4.8L any day. I thought about trading my 4.3 in for an identical truck with a 4.8L, but after the test drive I decided not too. The 4.3L has much better TQ for cruising and taking off. The 4.8L couldnt spin the tires no matter how hard I tried. The 4.3L would spin them (both) at 3/4 throttle. I wish I still had that truck, I am looking for a cheap used one now for a little project.
I wish I had that problem. My 4.8 is kinda traction impaired.
#39
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: gonzales, louisiana
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im just seeing what I can get out of this v6 for now. When I get the money, or when I get a good job im going a 6.0 swap with a T56. Gotta change the interior too if I decide with the T56 thoguh.
#40
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 3,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts