Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

'09 5.3 on the dyno again

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2010, 01:23 PM
  #31  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
ForcedTQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

Originally Posted by LS1FREEK
The new 5.3's have flat top pistons but they also went from 61cc heads (most 99-06) to 64cc on the new (07 up) 243/799 heads. So in all reality, they did not gain any compression.
Actually, if you read a little bit, you will see that the flat top pistons difference in volume from the dished pistons volume is greater than the 3cc gain in combustion chamber volume. Hence the .5 point increase in static compression ratio from 9.4 to 9.9. They Do Gain Compression, the L33's and new LY5's (the 5.3's in the 2007+ NNBS trucks) that is.
Old 02-07-2010, 02:47 PM
  #32  
On The Tree
 
LSwonderfull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ForcedTQ
Actually, if you read a little bit, you will see that the flat top pistons difference in volume from the dished pistons volume is greater than the 3cc gain in combustion chamber volume. Hence the .5 point increase in static compression ratio from 9.4 to 9.9. They Do Gain Compression, the L33's and new LY5's (the 5.3's in the 2007+ NNBS trucks) that is.
Exactly, i was just ready to comment about that , its in the flat top design and conservative crevice volume of the newer 5.3 pistons. My opinion is that the .5 point in compression is almost as important as the flow gains of 243 heads over the previous 5.3 castings. The chamber of the 243 is somewhat shrouded by the small 5.3 bore. Not sure how much that hurts gains...
Old 02-28-2010, 08:56 AM
  #33  
Launching!
 
KHester84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I was thinking about a turbo system in my '08 5.3, but after seeing these results this is very impressive and costs a whole lot less! Do you think that cam is too big for an extended cab z71? I'm looking to have at least 350hp daily driven. Don't mean to hijack the thread guys.

Keith

Last edited by KHester84; 02-28-2010 at 09:10 AM.
Old 03-02-2010, 04:21 AM
  #34  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
norris_83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the truck drove great.. this is an all around cam i advise everyone to use for a starter cam... idle needs to be set around 700-750 though. thats the only flaw
Old 03-02-2010, 09:09 AM
  #35  
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (1)
 
LS1FREEK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sublette, KS
Posts: 1,333
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Yeah, I have a similar cam in my truck and it made great power and is VERY daily drivable. After i dyno tuned it tho. Check out my signature. The cam feels doggy down low but its just cuz it pulls SO much harder up top. I think i lost very little down low over stock.
Old 03-02-2010, 04:16 PM
  #36  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
norris_83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

congrats on the final outcome LS1Freek! Might get a custom cam made up with your specs and see how it fairs on the newer trucks
Old 03-02-2010, 05:05 PM
  #37  
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (1)
 
LS1FREEK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sublette, KS
Posts: 1,333
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by norris_83
congrats on the final outcome LS1Freek! Might get a custom cam made up with your specs and see how it fairs on the newer trucks
Thanks! Yeah I'm really happy. But most ppl don't think that my truck really made that much. It does sound a little high for an LM7 5.3, but thats what the dyno said. It may be off a little, but even at 20 hp its still impressive. But yeah, i love the cam! We never saw any knock retard with 28 deg timing, even when it was running lean. I'd definitely recommend it to any one with a 5.3
Old 03-02-2010, 05:22 PM
  #38  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
zipster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Joliet, Illinois
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey guys, sorry for the noob question, but when you are refering to the new 5.3 to the old 5.3 what designates old/new? I would guess the reluctor ring teeth, but I am not sure.
Old 03-29-2010, 06:58 PM
  #39  
TECH Fanatic
 
sand man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Saudi Arabia
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

on what octan did you tune Bader?
Old 03-30-2010, 11:09 AM
  #40  
TECH Apprentice
 
yurs78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Juda
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zipster
Hey guys, sorry for the noob question, but when you are refering to the new 5.3 to the old 5.3 what designates old/new? I would guess the reluctor ring teeth, but I am not sure.
Read through the first 2 or 3 pages of this thread it will explain everything. The new 5.3 is pretty bad ***.
Welcome to the forum


Quick Reply: '09 5.3 on the dyno again



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:32 AM.