Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

232 236 113+2 and ported fast lsxrt 102 results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2010, 12:19 PM
  #21  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
jophuss36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: nw Indiana
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Has anyone else used this same cam/ or intake manifold? And if so do you have a dynochart?
Old 06-09-2010, 06:26 PM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Jake99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jophuss36
Has anyone else used this same cam/ or intake manifold? And if so do you have a dynochart?
Im running a cam like that just in a 112lsa but i have the proflow intake, my cr is at 11-1 and its a 346 and it make a **** ton of mid range torque and still pulls hard to 7k, if i shift it at 5500 it still dont bog into the next gear, i dont think the cam is the problem, however if the intake is ported it could be in there somewhere.. but sorry no dyno sheets yet.. btw whats the lift on the cam?
Old 06-09-2010, 08:27 PM
  #23  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
jophuss36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: nw Indiana
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

614ish. Lsl lobes
Old 06-10-2010, 05:03 PM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Jake99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jophuss36
614ish. Lsl lobes
Yeah i just dont think it should be the cam, were did you see the loss at the track, was it the 60 foot or trap speed?
Old 06-10-2010, 08:10 PM
  #25  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
jophuss36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: nw Indiana
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It was in the 60 foot. Ran 1.90 before and now2.0-2.1
Old 06-10-2010, 09:44 PM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Jake99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah i figered, the 215 intake dur. on your old cam would shur help it out of the hole some but with the stall you have that shouldnt be a big problem even with this cam, my guess is its the intake, i dont know much about these new fast intakes but with it being ported yet i bet the runners are huge and caused a torque loss, my intake has alot of valume in it and it seemed to take away some mid range torque too. But i may be wrong, id hate to see you spend the money on this and lose power...
Old 06-12-2010, 06:59 AM
  #27  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
SweetS10V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jophuss36
Has anyone else used this same cam/ or intake manifold? And if so do you have a dynochart?
Ive done a few now..

One was an 5.3L with CAI, LT headers, Catback, stock camshaft, stock everything else. The LSXRT gained 23hp without any losses.

I was also a part of an LSXRT intake swap on an LQ4 with a 219/227 LSR cam and it was dead even up to 3500RPM. After 3500 it gained 25hp.

Last edited by SweetS10V8; 06-12-2010 at 07:16 AM.
Old 06-12-2010, 11:58 AM
  #28  
On The Tree
iTrader: (6)
 
Pontiac Derek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That Cam would hurt worse than the Intake in Low end Power IMHO,have you tried running 27-28* all in by 2500 on up?
Old 06-12-2010, 02:36 PM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Jake99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wonder if its the porting on the intake? if you look on the dyno sheet there a big drop in hp and torque between 4200 and 4800rpm, that would be pretty much right after you take off and could be killing the 60 foot????
Old 06-12-2010, 03:13 PM
  #30  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
jophuss36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: nw Indiana
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pontiac Derek
That Cam would hurt worse than the Intake in Low end Power IMHO,have you tried running 27-28* all in by 2500 on up?
I'm not sure I could run that much timing with my high compression.... 11.65:1 Id have to ask Tj at baker engineering to chime in to answer that question though..


Quick Reply: 232 236 113+2 and ported fast lsxrt 102 results



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 AM.