Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

6.0L 5-Speed Dyno Day Today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-2008, 11:27 AM
  #121  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
rgvsierra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: RGV, Texas
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

good numbers, hirdlej

i wish i would have dynod my truck with the Torquer 2 and Dart heads, it was a totally different animal with the bigger cam and more compression. compared to that cam only setup above.

do you not have longtubes? you really need them, the person right now that has my 6.0 is runing some Thorley headers (small primaries and collectors) is not runing as good as when i had it in my truck.
Old 10-11-2008, 11:30 AM
  #122  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
hirdlej's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 3,470
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by dug
the gearing you got is ridiculous. might as well be revvin in neutral
I don't think my gearing is all that crazy. A lot of guys here are running 4:10's or so with their 4L60e's. If anything it should have given me a higher reading.
Old 10-11-2008, 11:31 AM
  #123  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
hirdlej's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 3,470
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by rgvsierra
good numbers, hirdlej

i wish i would have dynod my truck with the Torquer 2 and Dart heads, it was a totally different animal with the bigger cam and more compression. compared to that cam only setup above.

do you not have longtubes? you really need them, the person right now that has my 6.0 is runing some Thorley headers (small primaries and collectors) is not runing as good as when i had it in my truck.
I actually am running the OBX long tubes on my truck with the supplies off road Y pipe into a single 3.5" cat-back
Old 10-11-2008, 11:55 AM
  #124  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
rgvsierra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: RGV, Texas
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ohh, i never saw your mod list..
Old 10-11-2008, 02:34 PM
  #125  
TECH Resident
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: East of the east bay CA
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey hirdlej your right who cares about a dyno queen as long as it runs good and your beating the other guy then thats all that matters.
Old 10-11-2008, 04:27 PM
  #126  
TECH Veteran
 
zippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Wow, I should have posted my guess. I had guessed 350/380, just didn't post it. Did you log your dyno run? I'm just wondering how much timing you were running and if you'd had any KR*. I was thinking it would have peaked at 5500rpm, but it's not much off that. If I had to guess your cam has a +4 advance also?
Old 10-11-2008, 09:01 PM
  #127  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
hirdlej's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 3,470
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by zippy
Wow, I should have posted my guess. I had guessed 350/380, just didn't post it. Did you log your dyno run? I'm just wondering how much timing you were running and if you'd had any KR*. I was thinking it would have peaked at 5500rpm, but it's not much off that. If I had to guess your cam has a +4 advance also?


I didn't log it per se' put I DID command 27 degrees total advance on my best run. Any more or less and I lost power. 27 degrees was optimal. My cam has 2 degrees of advance built into it. I've never been one to "race dyno's" BUT if my data is accurate, I'm kind of frosted by the fact that a bone stock LQ4 with long tubes and a TR224 would have more average torque than my high comp, ported heads 6.0L.
Old 10-11-2008, 09:14 PM
  #128  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
hirdlej's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 3,470
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My AFR was perfect after a few hours of tuning with the stock narrowband. When I got to the dyno, I verified it with the wideband. The spark advance was all that was needed to tweak. I got a 10 RWHP jump in power and a 10RWTQ jump in twisting force from going from 34 deg total advance to 27 deg total advance.
Old 10-11-2008, 09:58 PM
  #129  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
rgvsierra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: RGV, Texas
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hirdlej
I didn't log it per se' put I DID command 27 degrees total advance on my best run. Any more or less and I lost power. 27 degrees was optimal. My cam has 2 degrees of advance built into it. I've never been one to "race dyno's" BUT if my data is accurate, I'm kind of frosted by the fact that a bone stock LQ4 with long tubes and a TR224 would have more average torque than my high comp, ported heads 6.0L.
i also had a k&n intake, underdrive pulley, 3"ory/3inch catback, efans, makes that 285 stock rwhp go up a bit. dont think i gained 105 just cam/headers..
Old 10-11-2008, 10:23 PM
  #130  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
hirdlej's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 3,470
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Are the intake, pulley and efans worth 40RWHP? I have a similar exhaust as you (rgvsierra)s


Quick Reply: 6.0L 5-Speed Dyno Day Today



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40 PM.