Well almost.
At 6K = 325rwhp with the advance but everything else makes sense!
Yeah, I think that would be great if you would make it to the track, I'll even let you take it for a spin

 

Hopefully this damn rain stops!!

 

What rain???? I'm frickin building an ark man. Unbeleivable weather. It's been raining here for what feels like 3 months, with a day or 2 of sun mixed in.
Going camping next month on the bike so this sh$t better end quick!

 

The first dyno represents stock cam vs. the 224 profile, correct?
And you didn't make more power with the 224 cam until 4800-4900 RPM?
Something, whether it be the dyno or your tune was not right from the get-go. You should match TQ by at least 3500 RPM with the 224 cam.... AT LEAST.

... Maybe I'm wrong... Just some odd results in my book.

 

Could the torque converter have anything to do with that?

Using photoshop I superimposed the graphs. Does that help?

Yellow= +4degs.
Red=+4 degs.

 

how did they advance the cam? did they use a adjustable timing set or jump teeth on the stock gears??