PerformanceTrucks.net Forums

Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

My new dyno sheet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-2010, 11:31 AM
  #11  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (13)
 
dlt76028's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Crowley, TX
Posts: 5,883
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default
Originally Posted by Fepony
My 4 door truck weighs in at 5300# last time out before new tune, i ran 7.6-7.8 1/8th mile. It should now run low 7's and low to mid 11's 1/4 mile.
nice times.
dlt76028 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-21-2010, 11:49 AM
  #12  
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (11)
 
tarinitup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Odessa Texas
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default
Originally Posted by dlt76028
theres quite a few extended cabs running low 12's with just n/a 6.0s and around 400hp and 400tq, so add another 164hp and 200tq and I guarantee you could shave off another second....
Your statement is bs cause 10 in an extended cab are not easy. Thunder550,2004sss, and myself have been close and we were at at 700 plus hp.
tarinitup is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-21-2010, 11:52 AM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (28)
 
skolman91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: muncie IN
Posts: 2,018
Received 57 Likes on 35 Posts
Default
psi?
only thing i would be jealous of is that torque curve, or i should say lack their of a curve..
skolman91 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-21-2010, 11:55 AM
  #14  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (13)
 
dlt76028's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Crowley, TX
Posts: 5,883
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default
Originally Posted by tarinitup
Your statement is bs cause 10 in an extended cab are not easy. Thunder550,2004sss, and myself have been close and we were at at 700 plus hp.
I wonder what yall are doing wrong considering skeet ran 11.83 with a n/a 6.0 extended cab.
dlt76028 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-21-2010, 12:06 PM
  #15  
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
trever1t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default
Originally Posted by dlt76028
theres quite a few extended cabs running low 12's with just n/a 6.0s and around 400hp and 400tq, so add another 164hp and 200tq and I guarantee you could shave off another second....
Originally Posted by tarinitup
Your statement is bs cause 10 in an extended cab are not easy. Thunder550,2004sss, and myself have been close and we were at at 700 plus hp.
Originally Posted by dlt76028
I wonder what yall are doing wrong considering skeet ran 11.83 with a n/a 6.0 extended cab.
What you don't get is that it takes more HP exponentially the faster you get. It's not a smooth 100hp=.xxx fater 1/4 mile.

At 625hp I make the 1/4 mile in 11.34 seconds with a race weight of ~5,000lbs. To run 10's I would need quite a bit more than 34hp.

I agree with the OP's statement, I think he'd be in the 11.6-11.8 zone just because it falls sooner than the higher turning GM engine.
trever1t is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-21-2010, 12:09 PM
  #16  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Fepony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: N.W. Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by skolman91
psi?
only thing i would be jealous of is that torque curve, or i should say lack their of a curve..

I am currently only making 15 psi...the Whipple is good for 25.
Fepony is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-21-2010, 12:19 PM
  #17  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (13)
 
dlt76028's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Crowley, TX
Posts: 5,883
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default
Originally Posted by trever1t
What you don't get is that it takes more HP exponentially the faster you get. It's not a smooth 100hp=.xxx fater 1/4 mile.

At 625hp I make the 1/4 mile in 11.34 seconds with a race weight of ~5,000lbs. To run 10's I would need quite a bit more than 34hp.

I agree with the OP's statement, I think he'd be in the 11.6-11.8 zone just because it falls sooner than the higher turning GM engine.
I'm talking about a 2wd extended cab that weigh ~4500lbs. Not to mention your truck isn't exactly setup for all out track times. I could add lower gears and a bigger converter, smaller wheels and easily shave off three tenths without adding any HP
Last edited by dlt76028; 11-21-2010 at 12:29 PM.
dlt76028 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-21-2010, 12:33 PM
  #18  
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
trever1t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default
agreed but neither is a Ford HD
trever1t is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-21-2010, 12:33 PM
  #19  
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (11)
 
tarinitup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Odessa Texas
Posts: 2,442
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default
Originally Posted by dlt76028
I wonder what yall are doing wrong considering skeet ran 11.83 with a n/a 6.0 extended cab.
Spending money on hp instead of traction was my biggest downfall. Do you have any personal input from actual experience you can enlighten us with to go fast.
tarinitup is offline  
Reply Like
Old 11-21-2010, 12:33 PM
  #20  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Fepony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: N.W. Florida
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by trever1t
What you don't get is that it takes more HP exponentially the faster you get. It's not a smooth 100hp=.xxx fater 1/4 mile.

At 625hp I make the 1/4 mile in 11.34 seconds with a race weight of ~5,000lbs. To run 10's I would need quite a bit more than 34hp.

I agree with the OP's statement, I think he'd be in the 11.6-11.8 zone just because it falls sooner than the higher turning GM engine.

I weigh in at 5500# with me in it and i think you are right on the money as far as my 1/4 mile times. I don't have 1/4 mile strip nearby so it was a guess.
Fepony is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: My new dyno sheet


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 AM.