Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Graphs | Power Comparisons | Dyno Truck List

New drive-shaft based Dyno. Need your help!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-26-2010 | 02:19 AM
  #11  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,266
Likes: 394
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

What dimensions do you need exactly? I have my half ton 4wd setup in pieces right now and.could easily measure for you
Old 12-26-2010 | 02:35 AM
  #12  
fastgmc98's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: Southwest AZ
Default

Subscribed, very, very interesting...
Old 12-26-2010 | 02:39 AM
  #13  
dr.mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: So Cal.
Default

#1 the dimensions of the slip-yoke.

#2, the dimension of the outside of the transfer case output-shaft housing.


Dimensions A A1 B C & D in the pic.

Old 12-26-2010 | 05:28 AM
  #14  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

Your numbers seem a bit low for a boosted 6L.
If anything your rwhp should be closer to you claimed flywheel HP.
Old 12-26-2010 | 06:07 AM
  #15  
dr.mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: So Cal.
Default

I only pulled up to ~4000rpm. The torque was still increasing. If it held steady to 5252RPM, then the flywheel HP would have been 478HP. But I think 400hp is probably closer to reality. I will try to get a full pull to 5500rpm in this week to verify. I need to toss in an LC-1, while I am at it.

With a stock/baseline of 300hp at the flywheel, I think much more than about a 30% increase in power is a bit much to ask for from ~ 6psi.

361RWHP would work out to something like 480hp at the flywheel in my setup. I don't think you can get much more than ~ +180hp from a 6psi blower. Even one with a cold output like a Wynjammer. In fact. I think the theoretical increase is only about 40% or about +122hp.

Other than the blower, and the injectors/tuning; this is a stock 6.0L. No cam, no headers, no pre-cat, no porting, etc.

If I get numbers like 360rwhp out of this setup, Al, over at Wynjammer, deserves a Nobel prize
Old 12-26-2010 | 07:48 AM
  #16  
Spoolin's Avatar
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 13,870
Likes: 4
From: Here and sometimes there too.
Default

Originally Posted by dr.mike
I only pulled up to ~4000rpm. The torque was still increasing. If it held steady to 5252RPM, then the flywheel HP would have been 478HP. But I think 400hp is probably closer to reality. I will try to get a full pull to 5500rpm in this week to verify. I need to toss in an LC-1, while I am at it.

With a stock/baseline of 300hp at the flywheel, I think much more than about a 30% increase in power is a bit much to ask for from ~ 6psi.

361RWHP would work out to something like 480hp at the flywheel in my setup. I don't think you can get much more than ~ +180hp from a 6psi blower. Even one with a cold output like a Wynjammer. In fact. I think the theoretical increase is only about 40% or about +122hp.

Other than the blower, and the injectors/tuning; this is a stock 6.0L. No cam, no headers, no pre-cat, no porting, etc.

If I get numbers like 360rwhp out of this setup, Al, over at Wynjammer, deserves a Nobel prize
I goofed and didn't pay close enough attention to your line about only pulling to 3960 rpm's. My bad!!
Even so, I would think with a full WOT pull to your shift points, a mid 3xx rwhp number is not out of the question.
Subscribing for updates on your next test!!
Old 12-26-2010 | 07:47 PM
  #17  
dr.mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: So Cal.
Default

I hope you are right But, I really think I need to make some exhaust system upgrades to get there. Or, maybe the stock HD exhaust is better than I think ?

My best guess is 400hp at the flywheel and 300hp at the wheels.

Next test will be Wednesday, when I get back home. I need to wire up the manifold pressure sensor and throttle position sensor inputs to get a better idea of what I am looking at.

All that said, I will probably never actually run this truck up to full power, other than for testing this toy. This is my tow.


This.... is my racer



Old 12-26-2010 | 08:07 PM
  #18  
Atomic's Avatar
I have a gauge for that
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,266
Likes: 394
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Originally Posted by dr.mike
Man that thing looks like it costs an arm and a leg to keep going, but im sure when you get on it its a lot of fun.....car looks cool too
Old 12-26-2010 | 09:39 PM
  #19  
dr.mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: So Cal.
Default

Had to get rid of one or the other. Guess which one I kept
Old 12-29-2010 | 05:10 PM
  #20  
dr.mike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: So Cal.
Default

Well, this sucks.

After making a best pull of 405hp & 505ft-lbs @ 4210rpm, The truck developed a rod knock. Had to send the truck over to the mechanic. Probable overhaul

Are the stock rod-bolts good for 500ft-lbs+ ?

either way, I'll upgrade to the ARP wave-lock type.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47 AM.