FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

2300 too big for 5.3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2012, 02:13 PM
  #21  
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
03sierraslt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western PA
Posts: 19,004
Received 217 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Oh there is no doubt it will work and make good numbers.
Old 09-19-2012, 02:53 PM
  #22  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
dick_landy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 393
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

My 5.3 with a 2300 is stout.
Old 09-19-2012, 02:56 PM
  #23  
11 Second Hall Moniter
iTrader: (22)
 
AKlowriderZ71's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,651
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Yeah, a blown 5.3 with stock cam, stock converter, and 3.42's (I think) cutting 1.8 short times is NOT lacking on the bottom end in my opinion. And with the larger blower, it shouldn't taper off quite as much in the higher rpm as it can sometimes with the smaller blowers.
Old 09-19-2012, 03:04 PM
  #24  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
skoal bandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Over Yunder
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If I run a 1900 at 8lbs and a 2300 at 8lbs, I'm assuming no difference, correct?
Old 09-19-2012, 03:50 PM
  #25  
11 Second Hall Moniter
iTrader: (22)
 
AKlowriderZ71's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,651
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Think volume & efficiency rather than psi.

10 psi with a ProCharger P1SC is considerably less power than 10 psi with a ProCharger D1SC. I believe the same thing would apply here, if everything else was equal.
Old 09-19-2012, 03:52 PM
  #26  
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
03sierraslt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western PA
Posts: 19,004
Received 217 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Prochargers also have completely different compressors between the two where as the TVS uses the same rotors just the 2300 is longer. Aren't the P1 and D1 wheels quite a bit different?
Old 09-19-2012, 03:56 PM
  #27  
11 Second Hall Moniter
iTrader: (22)
 
AKlowriderZ71's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,651
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Yes, they are. I just didn't have another analogy off the top of my head.

But I believe what I said to be true, even though I haven't had the opportunity to upgrade somebody's Maggie & have before & after numbers.
Old 09-19-2012, 04:24 PM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
tiffo60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by AKlowriderZ71
Yes, they are. I just didn't have another analogy off the top of my head.

But I believe what I said to be true, even though I haven't had the opportunity to upgrade somebody's Maggie & have before & after numbers.
You are correct, and 2300 will move more air than a 1900 at the same blower rpm....
Old 09-19-2012, 04:42 PM
  #29  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
swift700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Go with the 2300 and have no regrets. Trust me.
Old 09-19-2012, 05:04 PM
  #30  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (8)
 
quicksilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta, Ga.
Posts: 3,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by skoal bandit
If I run a 1900 at 8lbs and a 2300 at 8lbs, I'm assuming no difference, correct?
If you are sure you will not run more than about 12 psi, the 2300 would be a waste of money. Would be like putting a 88 mm turbo on a 5.3 and running 8 psi.


Quick Reply: 2300 too big for 5.3?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 AM.