FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

4.8 or 5.3 for boost?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-2008 | 10:43 PM
  #11  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

Originally Posted by Wilde Racing
That is true, If you could, a L33 pile would be they way to go, other than 6.0.
you said Pile, as in Nuclear reactor pile, right?

Old 11-21-2008 | 10:46 PM
  #12  
Stoichiometric's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 0
From: Way out there
Default

When the engine detonates it acts more like a pile driver. Shortens the rod a few inches at a time.
Old 11-21-2008 | 10:51 PM
  #13  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

shorter rods will alllow for higher rpms....crank it up!
Old 11-21-2008 | 10:54 PM
  #14  
kbracing96's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,485
Likes: 30
From: Oakland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by trever1t
shorter rods will alllow for higher rpms....crank it up!
Now your making stuff up! shorter rods = more rod angle= worse for RPM But it lowers compression so you can run more boost
Old 11-21-2008 | 10:56 PM
  #15  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

busted
Old 11-22-2008 | 12:56 AM
  #16  
Wilde Racing's Avatar
How do I change this text
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,294
Likes: 2
From: Behind the TIG welder
Default

Originally Posted by Stoichiometric
When the engine detonates it acts more like a pile driver. Shortens the rod a few inches at a time.
A few inches? DAMN how long are those rods???? Is the mean piston speed changed in anyway after this so called rod shortening process?
Old 11-24-2008 | 01:11 PM
  #17  
ls3s10's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: lake chuck
Default

my 08 on 12 lbs made 438 on very safe tune little 4.8 with headders, injectors and fuel pump. and 08 4.8 is 9.0 compression
Old 11-24-2008 | 01:14 PM
  #18  
nighthawk08's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 881
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio
Default

everyone in this thread is referring to old 4.8 vs 5.3 most of which is invalid for the Gen IV engines.

The 08 4.8 is roughly 9.2:1 compression, probably flat top pistons, 243 heads.

The 08 5.3 is roughly 9.9:1 compression, probably flat top pistons, 243 heads.

if he strickly wants to run boost and can't located a 5.3 RCSB the 4.8 would be a fine choice.
Old 11-24-2008 | 05:07 PM
  #19  
L7 Sierra's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Chino Hills, Ca
Default

4.8's are just fine and so is McCormick Vodka, but I think a 6.0 swap witf 8.5 cr is much much better
Old 11-25-2008 | 01:21 PM
  #20  
Noah Burns's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 3
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Default

8.5:1 is going to leave power on the table... it will be VERYYYYY safe, but leave a lot on the table too I think. 10:1 would be my starting point, get the tune right, run the right gas and you're good to go.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 AM.