760/722 Magnacharger?
01-31-2006, 06:44 PM
#12
Lets see what it can put out on pump gas. Race gas is great for bling numbers but real world is hwere its at IMO. I can put 110 in 418 and say oh it made 600rwhp but in reality when I drive it, it is only making 450 on 93. Im glad to see that there is a little bigger magnacharger coming out maybe the 6L guys wont scoff at it anymore saying it cant supply enough air. Obviously it can supply 200hp worth on an already stout motor. Get em to run it on pump gas and lets see what it puts out
Now I understand why you are so confident you are going to do soemthing great with your blue truck.
Now I understand why you are so confident you are going to do soemthing great with your blue truck.
01-31-2006, 07:02 PM
#13
Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
Lets see what it can put out on pump gas. Race gas is great for bling numbers but real world is hwere its at IMO. I can put 110 in 418 and say oh it made 600rwhp but in reality when I drive it, it is only making 450 on 93. Im glad to see that there is a little bigger magnacharger coming out maybe the 6L guys wont scoff at it anymore saying it cant supply enough air. Obviously it can supply 200hp worth on an already stout motor. Get em to run it on pump gas and lets see what it puts out
Now I understand why you are so confident you are going to do soemthing great with your blue truck.
Now I understand why you are so confident you are going to do soemthing great with your blue truck.
01-31-2006, 07:17 PM
#14
Oh Im sure it has to do with it being a "new" setup I would just like to see what it runs on pump gas. I dont know about you but I run 93 not 110. It is cool to a charger by them being able to feed a large CI motor well. Is the s/c "pullied down", does it have even more rpm potential or is it a maxed out blower in its current form?
01-31-2006, 07:18 PM
#15
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Galesburg Il
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
700 at the flywheel I'd assume. Sounds like it might be less than Whitt1 with his 600+ at the wheels. If the parasitic loss is 20% then Whitt would have to be makeing 750 at the flywheel to get 600 at the wheels and he's getting more than 600.... or was.
01-31-2006, 07:23 PM
#16
Originally Posted by JimS
700 at the flywheel I'd assume. Sounds like it might be less than Whitt1 with his 600+ at the wheels. If the parasitic loss is 20% then Whitt would have to be makeing 750 at the flywheel to get 600 at the wheels and he's getting more than 600.... or was.
01-31-2006, 07:26 PM
#17
Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
Oh Im sure it has to do with it being a "new" setup I would just like to see what it runs on pump gas. I dont know about you but I run 93 not 110. It is cool to a charger by them being able to feed a large CI motor well. Is the s/c "pullied down", does it have even more rpm potential or is it a maxed out blower in its current form?
From what I understand there is room to grow
01-31-2006, 07:28 PM
#18
Originally Posted by moregrip
I'm sure a pump gas run will be addressed at some point
From what I understand there is room to grow
From what I understand there is room to grow
I would be interested to know what the IATs were on this setup. That seems to be the bad part of the radix setup.
01-31-2006, 07:29 PM
#19
Launching!
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: San Diego,CA
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Great numbers! Congrats. I'm curious why you chose 10.8:1 @ 9 lbs boost vs something like 8:1 @ 15lbs ? Wouldn't the lower cr make safer boost with more potential? Not argueing just trying to learn.