FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

760/722 Magnacharger?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-31-2006, 10:13 PM
  #51  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (4)
 
leftcoast32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It sure would be nice to feed my planned engine with this monster!
Old 01-31-2006, 10:13 PM
  #52  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
TurboGibbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlownChevy
Ummm group Hug?
Ohhhh....
Old 01-31-2006, 11:03 PM
  #53  
TECH Junkie
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: memphis tn
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Those are impressive numbers,I've been told that a MP122 did not exist for months,so now that I give up and buy a 3.3 liter Whipple you start posting dyno numbers.I guess I'll have to make due with a Whipple.
Old 02-01-2006, 12:42 AM
  #54  
what a rush!
iTrader: (8)
 
moregrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 17,611
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by whitt1
Those are impressive numbers,I've been told that a MP122 did not exist for months,so now that I give up and buy a 3.3 liter Whipple you start posting dyno numbers.I guess I'll have to make due with a Whipple.
I'll be sure and report back

I'm sure that 3.3 will be everything you expect it to be and then some
Old 02-01-2006, 12:56 AM
  #55  
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
1slow01Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mjhoward
Exactly. I think 1slow01z71 just needs to get a little
Um Mark Im backin TX I already got some the day after I got back so

Im not pissing on anyones parade or trying to down any product just simply wanted to see what it would make "maxxed" out on pump gas. I will be putting some form of FI on my truck in about 6 months and I want to see the power potential of it on 93 because thats what I run not 110. I wasnt trying ot make it out to be a bad blower. Just want to see what its capable of thats all.
Old 02-01-2006, 12:58 AM
  #56  
what a rush!
iTrader: (8)
 
moregrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 17,611
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
Um Mark Im backin TX I already got some the day after I got back so

Im not pissing on anyones parade or trying to down any product just simply wanted to see what it would make "maxxed" out on pump gas. I will be putting some form of FI on my truck in about 6 months and I want to see the power potential of it on 93 because thats what I run not 110. I wasnt trying ot make it out to be a bad blower. Just want to see what its capable of thats all.
patience, it was a first test


anyone ever tell you that you are demanding
Old 02-01-2006, 06:25 AM
  #57  
TECH Fanatic
 
JimS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Galesburg Il
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mjhoward
Exactly. I think 1slow01z71 just needs to get a little

RFLMFAO
Old 02-01-2006, 09:36 AM
  #58  
blownerator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
BlownChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1986
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 18,745
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
Um Mark Im backin TX I already got some the day after I got back so

Im not pissing on anyones parade or trying to down any product just simply wanted to see what it would make "maxxed" out on pump gas. I will be putting some form of FI on my truck in about 6 months and I want to see the power potential of it on 93 because thats what I run not 110. I wasnt trying ot make it out to be a bad blower. Just want to see what its capable of thats all.

Again, this was not planned.....It just happend this way, I am sure some testing will be done soon on pump gas and a big CI motor. This motor was not even purpose built for boost (check that cam) and it still made 200 hp over the baseline.
Old 02-01-2006, 10:00 AM
  #59  
blownerator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
BlownChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1986
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 18,745
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Not that it matters at this point, but I just found out the test was done
with 100 octane
Old 02-01-2006, 10:23 AM
  #60  
what a rush!
iTrader: (8)
 
moregrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 17,611
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlownChevy
Not that it matters at this point, but I just found out the test was done
with 100 octane
Obviously, that's even more impressive, did you revise your initial post?


Quick Reply: 760/722 Magnacharger?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 AM.