anyone running this new intake manifold?
06-20-2011, 11:34 PM
#14
i dont think it resemble's the pro flow.. the pro flow is very square and bulky and this one looks like a sheet metal... powder coat this baby flat or glossy black! and if it performs just as good as all the other intakes then its a win win situation considering its only 600$ for the 92mm version which is what i will probly go with. still undecided!
09-05-2011, 06:35 AM
#16
hey Josh i really think the intake would perform well in a boosted appilcation, maybe in a NA application, like aklo mentioned large runners large plenum always adds up to large amounts of air, now for the heads since youre boosted id think the LSA heads would benefit you well but not so much on a NA application , trust me i been there NA lol and lost 7-10 rwhp NA on my 410 build so i went back to the ls3/l92 heads. honestly me being NA im wanting to see the difference in both FAST intakes but im not wanting to spend the cash to find out lol ,)
personally intakes fail cause of the lack of the rest of the parts to complete a combination.. thus recieves bad reports..
personally intakes fail cause of the lack of the rest of the parts to complete a combination.. thus recieves bad reports..
09-05-2011, 02:10 PM
#18
TECH Resident
iTrader: (36)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lafayette, CA
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks cool but it's hard to justify the $$$ considering how well the OEM truck intakes perform, especially the TBSS version for the cathedral port heads.
Rick
Rick
09-07-2011, 05:51 PM
#19
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was going to run one of these on my setup but in the end Im with Rick. Couldn't justify the cost or the wait time for that matter. Summit and Jegs kept moving the shipping date out on their website. So in the end I went with l92 intake I got off ebay for cheap. It is purdy tho.
