Anyone Use 6.0L Heads on 4.8L to Lower the Compression Ratio?
#12
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Western WA
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dug
I thought off idle torque is a non issue with screw superchargers. 25lbs is probably too much but lower compression is always gonna be safer.
#13
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thats my point, the more boost you run, the quicker it comes on. Also, you can get a higher stalled torque converter that allows higher rpms outta of the hole. Dont Ford Lightenings and cobras have 8.5 to 1 compression?
#14
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Way out there
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lower compression *can* have a benefit if you are in boost more often than not, i.e. race car/truck. There is a tradeoff with low compression of non-boost response that can make a street vehicle less fun to drive. It is a give and take, just like camshaft selection.
#15
Originally Posted by vanillagorilla
The stock 4.8 won't last long either pushing 25psi. If you're serious about high boost, then why worry about the SCR. At the boost levels you're talking race gas will be a necessity no matter what SCR you have.
#16
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You never know how bad a low compression 4.8 is till you have one Our built up 8.5-1 comp. 4.8 made a whopping 200rwhp NA and 630hp with a Turbo. Off boost it sucked ,bad.
#18
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
Originally Posted by dug
yeah, but still made 630rwhp