FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

Boost Cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-13-2013, 09:24 PM
  #21  
I have a gauge for that
iTrader: (42)
 
Atomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 16,261
Received 391 Likes on 261 Posts
Default

With the backpressure a vast majority of the setups here have I would select a cam with single duration or a very small exhaust bias. I had a 226/226 on a 117 and loved it. Now I have a 230/233 114 and its a bit pickier but acts like a more aggressive cam, which it is. A huge exhaust bias will just hurt you with a turbo.
Old 11-13-2013, 10:53 PM
  #22  
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
graysilverado5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
With the backpressure a vast majority of the setups here have I would select a cam with single duration or a very small exhaust bias. I had a 226/226 on a 117 and loved it. Now I have a 230/233 114 and its a bit pickier but acts like a more aggressive cam, which it is. A huge exhaust bias will just hurt you with a turbo.
Im with you on the exhaust bias. Ran a 212/218 114lsa then switched to a isky 218/218 112lsa and I definatly could tell a difference between both. Truck pulled much better with the single duration cam.
Old 11-13-2013, 11:07 PM
  #23  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
shifty89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
With the backpressure a vast majority of the setups here have I would select a cam with single duration or a very small exhaust bias. I had a 226/226 on a 117 and loved it. Now I have a 230/233 114 and its a bit pickier but acts like a more aggressive cam, which it is. A huge exhaust bias will just hurt you with a turbo.
Assuming a truck had a charger with a turbine that actually flowed a little, would you think an exhaust bias would be beneficial? Asking because you run one with a good turbine.

I run a triple 212, asking for the sake of curiosity and informational posts.
Old 11-14-2013, 01:36 AM
  #24  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Iconoclast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thank you for the explanation.
Im torn here lol..Im going to assume the triple 12 would make more TQ down low..This will not be a track truck, its a go out and have as much fun as possible on the street truck.
...but a..say 228/228 .571/.571 112LSA would sound a lot better, but there goes my TQ.

*****
Old 11-14-2013, 03:49 AM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
gamble686's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Go with the TU1 cam from speed inc. it is proven to do awesome in a 5.3 and its a little bigger. 225/225 honestly the exact 5.3 turbo cam I want down the road.
Old 11-14-2013, 06:20 AM
  #26  
I have a gauge for that
iTrader: (42)
 
Atomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 16,261
Received 391 Likes on 261 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shifty89
Assuming a truck had a charger with a turbine that actually flowed a little, would you think an exhaust bias would be beneficial? Asking because you run one with a good turbine.

I run a triple 212, asking for the sake of curiosity and informational posts.
Same story, my setup still has a backpressure ratio of close to 2:1. Most peoples are probably around 2.5-3.

You want more exhaust duration because the exhaust port usually flows a good bit less than the intake port, however with a turbo the exhaust is much hotter and therefor is more motivated to get out of the port, so you dont need as much duration. With a supercharger, you will want a bigger split.

I wouldnt consider backpressure a non-issue until the backpressure was 1.5 or better.
Old 11-14-2013, 06:26 AM
  #27  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
slowec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Brunswick, Ga
Posts: 3,062
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

torn on a 212 ...

get a 215/215 and never think about a cam again. IMO
Old 11-14-2013, 05:12 PM
  #28  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Iconoclast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think i might get the TU1.5
Old 11-14-2013, 06:57 PM
  #29  
Laid Back
iTrader: (18)
 
Beatdown Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 2,389
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Do it!!!!!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2500ZL1
8-Lug Truck Performance
60
01-25-2016 06:30 AM
Silveradorst07
FORCED INDUCTION
65
12-31-2015 12:04 AM
urdone
FORCED INDUCTION
10
08-18-2015 12:17 PM
JordanH
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
9
08-08-2015 07:59 PM
Jake99
FORCED INDUCTION
18
08-08-2015 07:56 AM



Quick Reply: Boost Cam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 AM.