FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

COPO Whipple 4.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2012, 09:57 PM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
ltr450ryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: wi.... winters sucks
Posts: 1,278
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i just want the blower lol even the 3.4 would make **** move!
Old 06-26-2012, 10:01 PM
  #22  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
ak2007r6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Alaska
Posts: 4,104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by black00chev
This is borrowed straight from Chevrolet Performance's facebook page. They posted some in-progress build pics of the COPOs and this one is the LSX 327/4.0L combo.


good god.. that is a beautiful sight.


going to look that page up to add
Old 06-26-2012, 10:02 PM
  #23  
Slowest turbo build ever!
iTrader: (2)
 
black00chev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Warrenton, VA
Posts: 2,905
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I just did some looking around and they are throwing around 900hp for estimates on the 5.3L/4.0L combo.
Old 06-26-2012, 10:06 PM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
ltr450ryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: wi.... winters sucks
Posts: 1,278
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by black00chev
I just did some looking around and they are throwing around 900hp for estimates on the 5.3L/4.0L combo.
that would do wonders for my 408! i could get like 18-20lbs out of it for the 408 be a great day in my life lol
Old 06-26-2012, 10:10 PM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
1Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Jones Creek, Texas
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TIM Z
Im behind, so this COPO is running that huge blower on a 5.3??? INSANE!!!

Ive got reading to do
Not picking on you, because like you said, you've got some catching up to do.

Remember, it’s not your typical 5.3L coming in at a 4.065-inch bore x 3.150-inch stroke with CNC ported LS7 heads equipped with Del West 2.200” titanium intake and 1.610” sodium filled exhaust valves. While I’ve not seen an upper ceiling limit on this little fellow, it should be a screamer.
Old 06-27-2012, 04:42 AM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
schino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: flemington nj
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that picture you posted is definately not the same setup that is in the magazine. when i get home later ill take a picture of the page. im thinking they either switched to or from the jackshaft version or one or the other (2.9 4.0) is jackshaft. i forget the exact hp number that its rated at from gm i want to say 650 hahaha. i think they are playing the old school games and rating the car at 3k rpm. the SCJ is making upwards of 900 and they claim the drag pak challenger is 850 NA which i believe they get a weight break for not being forced induction. the really funny one is the 427 NA motor that is rated at 550. i know an ls7 with heads, intake, cam, stock bottom end will make 650 on an engine dyno.

callies does make the bottom end for these and they had these cranks for insanely cheap. they were billet and i want to say going for something like $400, there were some weird things with them though like they didnt have provision for the reluctor wheel but you could find ways around that im sure
Old 06-27-2012, 04:50 AM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
schino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: flemington nj
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

callies part number APZ31V-DS dragon slayer crank 3.15 stroke listed as in process
Old 06-27-2012, 06:33 AM
  #28  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
DoubleTrouble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Saint Marys, GA
Posts: 225
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by schino
im thinking they either switched to or from the jackshaft version or one or the other (2.9 4.0) is jackshaft.
The 327/2.9 Whipple has a front inlet while the 327/4.0 Whipple has a rear inlet.

*Meanwhile, I've been on the phone with Mike from Whipple and I may be looking at a new route. It's a Camaro based race-inspired blower that is about 6 to 8 months from hitting the streets. It will feature Whipple's new rotor design, be 1 cm shorter than a 4.0 case, and have a front inlet. Oh yeah, did I mention that it will be half a liter larger?
Old 06-27-2012, 12:28 PM
  #29  
Slowest turbo build ever!
iTrader: (2)
 
black00chev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Warrenton, VA
Posts: 2,905
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thats gonna be one tall blower! I bet those rotors will be pretty large in diameter.
Old 06-27-2012, 01:53 PM
  #30  
Truck Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
TrickTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wichita Falls Tx.
Posts: 4,466
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

4.0 is a long blower compared to the 3.4L.
To fit the truck even with from inlet. Is gonna be a challenge.
3.4 barely fits. With a single belt. Leaving all things same location add the 4.0 pushes you out past the stock drive a good amount.

Another think is the height. Much taller then the 3.4 the under hood supports might need to be cut depending on year???


Quick Reply: COPO Whipple 4.0



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 AM.