which FI is better for a stock 5.3
#91
My 06 bone stock 5.3 with a D1 Procharger and supporting fuel mods netted 440 rwhp on a dynojet then blew up 2 days later...............lol!
I'm sure if the tuneup was done correctly it would have made somewhere in the 400-425 rwhp range and lasted much longer. Thanks MTI in Houston Texas!
I'm sure if the tuneup was done correctly it would have made somewhere in the 400-425 rwhp range and lasted much longer. Thanks MTI in Houston Texas!
Thats not even too much of what these engines can take. A friend's truck that i helped him build made 510 rwhp @ 11psi without TC locking up....ran a 11.8@113. Hes a member here too (la diablita)...but of course it was well tuned with meth.....raced alot of times with no issues. Until he put nos, thats where a piston failed.
#97
11 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cedar, MN
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats a waste of money. A 40k mile complete engine for 11-1400 is much more reasonable. It makes no sense to pay that much money for something that has no advantage over the other option. I got my 60k mile lq4 complete throttle body toe exhaust manifold to oil pan for $795.
#99
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
yeah i figure 3200 was lil much...but some of the site i been on ,the y want 7000 for an ls3 6.2 with 480 hp...complete wire ecm ...everything....but the tranny