Lyscholm Vs MagnaCharger
04-28-2006, 08:52 PM
#31
Originally Posted by moregrip
side by side:
MP122............................................. .................................................. .......Lysholm
MP122............................................. .................................................. .......Lysholm
my .02
thanks for the info
04-28-2006, 09:03 PM
#32
Originally Posted by 02sierraz71_5.3
with my 3k stall I never see below 4k rpms except for part of the 60ft, Id expect the lysholm blower to be at least .3sec faster in the 1/4. At 20 higher iat's its making around 25more hp and 30 more tq @ 4k rpms. I definately think the 122 is more efficent especially to be able to compete against a blower with around 20% more capacity but in the end its about who is faster.
my .02
thanks for the info
my .02
thanks for the info
under WOT or near WOT I agree, however, I find myself at partial boost and something less than WOT far more often then the condition you described above.
Last edited by moregrip; 04-28-2006 at 09:08 PM.
04-28-2006, 09:11 PM
#33
Originally Posted by moregrip
I expected a response like this
under WOT or near WOT I agree, however, I find myself at partial boost and something less than WOT far more often than the condition you described above.
under WOT or near WOT I agree, however, I find myself at partial boost and something less than WOT far more often than the condition you described above.
for a daily that will see stop and go everyday and needs reliability Id go with a magna hands down
04-28-2006, 09:18 PM
#35
TECH Junkie
I'd like to see the same comparison on a LS2 6.0 with it's better breathing heads.That would give a better idea of the potential of both superchargers.My guess is that the 122H will be targeted at Vette owners first.
04-28-2006, 10:05 PM
#36
As I said early in this post, you really can't outright compare 10psi of boost between the two unless EVERYTHING is identical. That means the better designed Radix J tube will skew the results when compared to the whipples crappy 90* bend inlet.
With the better intake, the Radix isn't fighting a restriction and will make more psi with out overspinning the blower (less heat). The whipple will have to spin more rpms to compensate for the crappy intake to produce 10psi, therefore generating more heat.
Which blower has less parasitic loss?
With the better intake, the Radix isn't fighting a restriction and will make more psi with out overspinning the blower (less heat). The whipple will have to spin more rpms to compensate for the crappy intake to produce 10psi, therefore generating more heat.
Which blower has less parasitic loss?
04-28-2006, 11:36 PM
#38
TECH Junkie
Originally Posted by MNC5
Nice graphs... I called three weeks ago and was told it might be ready for delivery by December or later. Is the 122 a bolt on replacement for the 112?
04-28-2006, 11:37 PM
#39
Originally Posted by BigTex
As I said early in this post, you really can't outright compare 10psi of boost between the two unless EVERYTHING is identical. That means the better designed Radix J tube will skew the results when compared to the whipples crappy 90* bend inlet.
With the better intake, the Radix isn't fighting a restriction and will make more psi with out overspinning the blower (less heat). The whipple will have to spin more rpms to compensate for the crappy intake to produce 10psi, therefore generating more heat.
Which blower has less parasitic loss?
With the better intake, the Radix isn't fighting a restriction and will make more psi with out overspinning the blower (less heat). The whipple will have to spin more rpms to compensate for the crappy intake to produce 10psi, therefore generating more heat.
Which blower has less parasitic loss?