Lyscholm Vs MagnaCharger
04-29-2006, 07:04 PM
#42
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Western WA
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmmm... so much for Whipple's claim that their "superior" twin-screw design does not need an intercooler. 
Thanks for the information, Brian. This is invaluable. 
Thanks for the information, Brian. This is invaluable.
04-29-2006, 07:17 PM
#43
Originally Posted by BlownChevy
More info for you Richard. Please note that the "oil out" channel is actually discharge temps. What you have to remember: This is proving the Screw companies past claims of 80-100* less in discharge temps.
for some reason these kinds of graphs are always easier for me to comprehend, damn good data, and quite honestly, I am surprised the lysholm ran so hot.
any plans for an autorotor?
04-29-2006, 07:19 PM
#44
Former Moderator :(
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BOULEVARDS OF BOOST CALIFORNIA
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like the fact that 10 lbs of whipple boost and 10 lb of Magna Charger boost produce identical HP and torque numbers at 6400 rpm and the Magna Charger is a 2.0 and the whipple is a 2.3. even the difference in heat did not seem to affect the numbers. I also know this would be a whole different ball game on a 427 with 15 lbs of boost but for a every day street vehicle on pump gas and 10 lbs of boost or less the Magna Charger really shines
04-29-2006, 07:23 PM
#45
Originally Posted by Crash Dummy
I like the fact that 10 lbs of whipple boost and 10 lb of Magna Charger boost produce identical HP and torque numbers at 6400 rpm and the Magna Charger is a 2.0 and the whipple is a 2.3. even the difference in heat did not seem to affect the numbers. I also know this would be a whole different ball game on a 427 with 15 lbs of boost but for a every day street vehicle on pump gas and 10 lbs of boost or less the Magna Charger really shines
that new 122 is an efficient bastard! you Magnuson boys sure know how to keep a guy broke
BTW Dummy, thanks for all your hard work, as always you are a huge part of what gets done around there, sort of the man behind the scenes
Last edited by moregrip; 04-29-2006 at 07:37 PM.
05-02-2006, 11:49 AM
#47
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlownChevy
Correct, however with the lower discharge temps more timing could be added 
.
This test was preformed to prove or disprove the claims of lower discharge temps.
.This test was preformed to prove or disprove the claims of lower discharge temps.
05-02-2006, 12:06 PM
#49
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was in an article about the Shelby GT500 powertrain and had a detail about the Eaton R122H. Basically went over how much it was an improvement over the previous design. It did particularly mention that it was a hybrid between the current and an upcoming design. There is nothing about this on the internet that I have found yet. I have the article and I'll scan it if I can find it.
05-02-2006, 12:42 PM
#50
Originally Posted by Blown330
It was in an article about the Shelby GT500 powertrain and had a detail about the Eaton R122H. Basically went over how much it was an improvement over the previous design. It did particularly mention that it was a hybrid between the current and an upcoming design. There is nothing about this on the internet that I have found yet. I have the article and I'll scan it if I can find it.