MP T-70 vs MP T-76
#1
MP T-70 vs MP T-76
After running the 70 with .96 a/r on my 5.3 I do think it would do fine on more cubic inches..... However..... How far out of effeciency rance would it be at say 15psi on a 5.7L motor?
I'm very strongly considering the 76 with the same size exhaust housing on the new motor.... Ill be running up to ~15psi with meth on the new powerplant.....
I'm very strongly considering the 76 with the same size exhaust housing on the new motor.... Ill be running up to ~15psi with meth on the new powerplant.....
#2
with a mild 2001 zo6 cam on a 5.3 the mp70 is done at 14psi. going from 14psi to 18psi gives no extra power. i would think on a 5.7 the turbo would be done at 12-13psi and on a 6.0 even sooner.
i think a mp76 would be ok on a 5.7 at 15psi but i bet it would be maxed right about then.
i dont know anything about the mp76 so what i am saying is just a guess but i have ran a basic t76 and it ran out around 14psi on a camed 6.0.
i think a mp76 would be ok on a 5.7 at 15psi but i bet it would be maxed right about then.
i dont know anything about the mp76 so what i am saying is just a guess but i have ran a basic t76 and it ran out around 14psi on a camed 6.0.
#3
with a mild 2001 zo6 cam on a 5.3 the mp70 is done at 14psi. going from 14psi to 18psi gives no extra power. i would think on a 5.7 the turbo would be done at 12-13psi and on a 6.0 even sooner.
i think a mp76 would be ok on a 5.7 at 15psi but i bet it would be maxed right about then.
i dont know anything about the mp76 so what i am saying is just a guess but i have ran a basic t76 and it ran out around 14psi on a camed 6.0.
i think a mp76 would be ok on a 5.7 at 15psi but i bet it would be maxed right about then.
i dont know anything about the mp76 so what i am saying is just a guess but i have ran a basic t76 and it ran out around 14psi on a camed 6.0.
#4
i had a .96. i dont think a larger exhaust housing would have helped much. if you look at a compresor map for a t76 it was running out of air right where you would expect it to.
#5
That's exactly what I just went through and have on my truck now, but i won't really be able to do any real testing on it till spring and I have the 80e in the truck. I don't want to brake the 65E, The MP T76 spools just a bit slower then the 70, both have the p-trim wheel and .96 housing, but that's what I expected it to do since it is a fair bit bigger compressor. It's still plenty fast, don't get me wrong. It does feel a bit stronger and more efficient, but I'm only running 9 psi in high boost right now, which is like 7 PSI at sea-level. This spring it WILL get put though some serious testing at 15-18 psi, .
Here is a comparison pic...
Here is a comparison pic...
#6
After running the 70 with .96 a/r on my 5.3 I do think it would do fine on more cubic inches..... However..... How far out of effeciency rance would it be at say 15psi on a 5.7L motor?
I'm very strongly considering the 76 with the same size exhaust housing on the new motor.... Ill be running up to ~15psi with meth on the new powerplant.....
I'm very strongly considering the 76 with the same size exhaust housing on the new motor.... Ill be running up to ~15psi with meth on the new powerplant.....
Bill
#7
Weekend /strip toy.... Ill be going from my current SS3600 converter to a PI 3000. The 5.7L longblock already has a GT2-3 cam and good heads but I'm considering changing it for a low 220s single pattern Isky turbo cam (definitely leaving the heads). It'll turn some 3.73s.
I am honestly not wanting to sink huge money into this thing for an upgrade which is why I'm sticking with a MP turbo. I COULD keep the 70, but I know it really wouldn't do it justice.
I am honestly not wanting to sink huge money into this thing for an upgrade which is why I'm sticking with a MP turbo. I COULD keep the 70, but I know it really wouldn't do it justice.
Trending Topics
#10
even a 76 is a little on the small side for a 6.0 expecialy in the 10-12psi range. 76 for sure.