FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

Not impressed by the "Hype"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2009, 10:33 PM
  #31  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
maddboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Elmhurst, IL
Posts: 4,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chevrolade
nope did not expect a dragster lol,yea i know there safe out of the box performance,but it was just not enough for my blood.
Ill be faster n/a

BTW HOPE YOU GET YOUR RIDE RUNNING THE WAY YOU WANT AND GET A OPEN FILTER AS WELL,IT WILL SCREAM LOUDER AND BREATH BETTER.FREE UP SOME HP
If you wanted more power maybe you shouldnt have started with a 4.8 liter engine.
Old 02-02-2009, 10:36 PM
  #32  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (22)
 
chevrolade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: pearsall.tx
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by maddboost
If you wanted more power maybe you shouldnt have started with a 4.8 liter engine.
EXACTLYI SHOULDVE DONE THIS IN THE FIRST PLACE

IM GOING 6.0L92 ,CAM, STALL FOR LESS<<<AND I KNOW IT WILL BE FASTER
Old 02-02-2009, 10:38 PM
  #33  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

I want Maggie! 500lb/ft!
Old 02-02-2009, 11:32 PM
  #34  
9 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (16)
 
stock48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, Co/ Central, Ca
Posts: 3,655
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 03tahoe22
Im running that combination now at ~11 psi not 9psi. No knock. Dont plan on a dragster and that isnt what this is about. Just wanting to know why I didnt get the results that most ppl have posted for the mods I added? Stock run was a 16.9. "1st Run" Radix, e-fans and 55hp wet shot @ 14.2. "2nd Run" New Mods hoping for a 12.9 is that impossible?
Where did you run these times? I installed a basic 112 kit + 1 size smaller pully on my friends 05 2wd, 5.3 EX cab and it went a traction limited 14.21 @97MPH in Ca with the Magnacharger tune. The truck was stock except for cat back exhaust. Another friend of mine has the same basic thing on a 5.3L SSR runs 14.50's in Las Vegas 2500' elv. Unless you live at high elevation you are getting robbed somewhere.
Old 02-03-2009, 07:02 AM
  #35  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
03tahoe22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

2X4 5.3 Tahoe 5600lbs on 22's with 3.42's in florida.....Never ran the Maggie tune always been on the dyno. Will be back to the track with drag radials this friday!
Old 02-03-2009, 09:22 AM
  #36  
TOTM: January 2007
iTrader: (4)
 
Last Call's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,678
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

I would take it to the track and see what it runs. Try not to get caught up in the dyno numbers. When I modded the 5.3, I got stuck in the dyno numbers and I was frsutrated. I started going to the track and got the 5.3 into the 13.40's on the 22's. With the 6.0 @ 448/457, I went 12.5 with slicks, and 13.2 with 22's.

The intake temps @ 11# seem very low. You must have a large heat exchanger set up. Seems that the power past 4500rpm is really falling off. I put the 3.0 pulley on my 5.3 and the intake temps went through the roof. I made a ton of torque down low, but when I went WOT on the dyno, it was detonating and couldnt get a full run on the dyno. Intake temps reached high 100's.low 200's w/ timing around 10-12 degreees. I switched from a 3.0 to a 3.25 pulley and ran 16 degrees of timing and made 406rwhp.

I had better luck with more timing and less boost. Do you give an idea, here is how things progressed for me with my 6.0.

448/457 - GT2-3, TOG mid legths, true duals, 3.1 pulley at 5#

473/503 - same mods as above plus alky kit and 2.9 pulley and tune

503/526

More tuning got me to 512/535. All runs above were made on the same dyno. I made 545/565 on Rick's Dynopack without the 22's. I am not sure if the 22's would cost me 30rwhp, but that is the only difference I could think of.
Old 02-03-2009, 10:33 AM
  #37  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
ecmoney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Okeechobee Flo-rida
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by 03tahoe22
2X4 5.3 Tahoe 5600lbs on 22's with 3.42's in florida.....Never ran the Maggie tune always been on the dyno. Will be back to the track with drag radials this friday!
you goin to palm beach international? If so i might come out and check it out, and run mine as well
Old 02-03-2009, 11:05 AM
  #38  
Moderately Differentiated
iTrader: (4)
 
dewmanshu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 27,563
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

That dyno graph looks like a tune that is aggressively pulling timing with IAT increase.
Old 02-03-2009, 11:50 AM
  #39  
TECH Junkie
 
ZO6Ted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 3,293
Received 254 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chevrolade
EXACTLYI SHOULDVE DONE THIS IN THE FIRST PLACE

IM GOING 6.0L92 ,CAM, STALL FOR LESS<<<AND I KNOW IT WILL BE FASTER
There are a lot of things I would have done differently if I knew the outcome. Wish I could've just done it all myself, at least it would have been done right.
Old 02-03-2009, 12:16 PM
  #40  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
03tahoe22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was planning on going to Palm Beach International friday night 2/6.... It was 50* outside during the runs iat were 120* max at full boost.


Quick Reply: Not impressed by the "Hype"



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:25 PM.