FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

problems with smaller pulley?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-14-2006, 11:58 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
BlownEscalade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default problems with smaller pulley?

I was wondering what problems could I encounter if I changed my pulley size from 3.3 to 3.1 or even 3.0. I got a 03 Escalade with the LQ9 6.0 H.O. motor, with headers and exhaust, and I think tuning (not sure cause i just bought te Escalade like this already with no info on the mods from the dealership). Ohh yeah I got the MagnaCharger supercharger. I read up and found that the Escalades came with the 3.3 pulley because of the already high compresion as oppose to the Denali. I think the Denali kit comes with the 3.1 pulley.
Old 06-15-2006, 05:43 AM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
Bowtie70SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have Silverado SS with the same engine. I run a 2.9 pulley and get about 8.5psi at redline. I did, however hurt my engine(has 60K on it), but it was my fault. There are lot's of people on SilveradoSS.com running 3.0 and smaller with no problems. If you are gonna do the smaller pulley you will need a custom tune and definately get a dyno tune. You shouldn't have and problems as long as you are "nice" to the transmission. By nice I mean no hard kickdowns...they kill the tranny faster than anything.

Dave
Old 06-15-2006, 01:03 PM
  #3  
TECH Regular
 
Blowndenalixl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Gee - you run a 0-60 time within 0.2 seconds of a guy in a 1000 lb (including driver) heavier vehicle and he has to rush out and buy a smaller pulley. BlownEscalade is gonna want a 1 inch pulley once I get my new tune.

See ya soon neighbor - be safe on the way home!

D
Old 06-15-2006, 02:58 PM
  #4  
Notorious BIG
iTrader: (6)
 
Holty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bowtie70SS
I have Silverado SS with the same engine. I run a 2.9 pulley and get about 8.5psi at redline. I did, however hurt my engine(has 60K on it), but it was my fault. There are lot's of people on SilveradoSS.com running 3.0 and smaller with no problems. If you are gonna do the smaller pulley you will need a custom tune and definately get a dyno tune. You shouldn't have and problems as long as you are "nice" to the transmission. By nice I mean no hard kickdowns...they kill the tranny faster than anything.

Dave

what kind of "hurt" did you do to your motor? details!


btw, i have a SSS with the LQ9 and am running the 2.8 pulley with no problems at all.
Old 06-25-2006, 12:52 AM
  #5  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
BlownEscalade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so if I got it tuned to the 3.1 or 3.0 pulley it would still be almost as reliable as my 3.3 stock pulley? Well exept the tranny? I just have to stay 2 steps ahead of BlownDenaliXl. We have neighbour wars here.
Even though I wanna blow BlownDenaliXl away, I still wanna have a dependable vehicle especially on the highway. That's where most of my driving is.
Old 06-26-2006, 11:31 AM
  #6  
TECH Regular
 
Blowndenalixl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlownEscalade
so if I got it tuned to the 3.1 or 3.0 pulley it would still be almost as reliable as my 3.3 stock pulley? Well exept the tranny? I just have to stay 2 steps ahead of BlownDenaliXl. We have neighbour wars here.
Even though I wanna blow BlownDenaliXl away, I still wanna have a dependable vehicle especially on the highway. That's where most of my driving is.
Save your money for your deck pal - I am going to let my wife drive, and the 150 lbs that saves will more than offset any pulley reduction you try out.

I don't know why this did not come to me sooner, I am sick of eating salad all the time trying to lose weight!
Old 07-01-2006, 01:35 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
GoatChs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far East Bay - Norcal
Posts: 520
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I went from a 3.1 to a 2.85 and the only "problem" I'm suffering is belt slip...
Old 07-01-2006, 10:17 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
 
JimS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Galesburg Il
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GoatChs
I went from a 3.1 to a 2.85 and the only "problem" I'm suffering is belt slip...
Switching to the 100mm Metco idler pulley's got rid of my belt slip.. that and a shorter belt.
Old 07-01-2006, 10:32 PM
  #9  
Notorious BIG
iTrader: (6)
 
Holty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JimS
Switching to the 100mm Metco idler pulley's got rid of my belt slip.. that and a shorter belt.

what size belt are you running now?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kalikid06
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
20
10-13-2015 07:37 AM
SlvrSierra4.8
GM Parts Classifieds
7
10-01-2015 09:39 PM
LARRY01Z28
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
28
09-28-2015 07:54 AM
murderedSS
GM Parts Classifieds
0
09-22-2015 03:53 AM
Justin87gn
FORCED INDUCTION
9
09-10-2015 12:06 PM



Quick Reply: problems with smaller pulley?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 PM.