Radix info for the 8.1L?

Whippled 496 · 2006-08-24 15:46:33

The 122HH ought to fit the bill I would think:D agreed :judge:

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

08-26-2006, 08:52 PM

#11

nightrunner

Mr. Obvious

iTrader: (4)

Join Date: Jan 2006

Location: Manchester, TN

Posts: 6,006

Likes: 0

Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71

The 122HH ought to fit the bill I would think

agreed

Reply Like

08-26-2006, 09:09 PM

#12

YenkoST

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (11)

Join Date: Feb 2005

Location: GA

Posts: 1,549

Likes: 0

Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

I would think the 122HH would be small for a 496 BB ....my thinking is that the mp112 is designed more for the 4.8/5.3 guys in mind....the mp122 for the 6.0L/408 guys...so a bigger model (mp132/142) would be needed to keep the IATs low for a BB....plus have the 132/142 as a upgrade for a 408/418...that would be awesome IMO.