FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

Radix numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2006, 12:24 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
BLASTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: bridgwater, nj
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LBSBLOWN
I agree with BlownChevy on this one, there must be some other problems
with your truck, even before the Radix your truck was low on power.

I have a 5.3 4x4 with a Radix and it makes 388hp and 424tq at the wheels,
before the Radix it made 225hp and 255tq at the wheels in completely stock
trim with only 745miles on it since new.
I will I had those numbers. How many lbs are you seeing?
Old 08-05-2006, 12:25 PM
  #12  
blownerator
iTrader: (20)
 
BlownChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1986
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 18,745
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BLASTER
Thanks for the offer. I'll check out for leak. Should I get a new stock MAF?

BTW, Are the compression test results normal? Was going to do a leak down but they seemed alright so I deferred.

they look fine to me....all within spec.

I would like to see you try another MAF for ***** an giggles. Dont buy one, maybe borrow a buddies.
Old 08-05-2006, 05:10 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
BLASTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: bridgwater, nj
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlownChevy
they look fine to me....all within spec.

I would like to see you try another MAF for ***** an giggles. Dont buy one, maybe borrow a buddies.
Can I use my LS1 MAF? My uncle has a 5.3 GMC. Would either of these be sufficiant?

Could I just run without it and verify anything?

Last edited by BLASTER; 08-05-2006 at 05:35 PM.
Old 08-06-2006, 03:43 AM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
 
GMC_DUDE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Western WA
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlownChevy
As I stated in the other thread that you brought back from the dead. If it is that lean with the stock magnuson calibration then you have a mecnahical issue. There is no way that the Magnuson calibration is going to let your truck run 13.0.

Who installed the kit?


My stock Magnacharger tune gives me 11:1 AFR at WOT, and 12:1 just as it goes out of closed loop. Since your fuel pessure numbers look good, it means your injectors are not opening enough. A post - MAF leak could do this. Here are a few other things to check:
          Old 08-07-2006, 08:57 PM
            #15  
          TECH Fanatic
          Thread Starter
          iTrader: (4)
           
          BLASTER's Avatar
           
          Join Date: Feb 2003
          Location: bridgwater, nj
          Posts: 1,528
          Likes: 0
          Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
          Default

          Originally Posted by GMC_DUDE


          My stock Magnacharger tune gives me 11:1 AFR at WOT, and 12:1 just as it goes out of closed loop. Since your fuel pessure numbers look good, it means your injectors are not opening enough. A post - MAF leak could do this. Here are a few other things to check:
                  I'll get a picture of the intake tract. What do you spray around and to see if you have a leak? Thanks for the TB tip. I'll check that.

                  Can I disconnect the MAF and run in SD? Would that tell me anything?

                  I verified all the PVC routing with the magnacharger guy just to make sure and they said it was correct. I just recently switched to a LS6 valley cover and PCV system but this problem has been resident months before that anyway.

                  The routing goes like this:
                  I made a hose adapter for the PVC valve and run it to a catch can. From there I go to the Radix intake port. The other hose goes from the back of the TB to the passenger side valve cover. Sound correct?
                  Old 08-07-2006, 09:26 PM
                    #16  
                  TECH Fanatic
                  Thread Starter
                  iTrader: (4)
                   
                  BLASTER's Avatar
                   
                  Join Date: Feb 2003
                  Location: bridgwater, nj
                  Posts: 1,528
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
                  Default

                  Originally Posted by LBSBLOWN
                  I agree with BlownChevy on this one, there must be some other problems
                  with your truck, even before the Radix your truck was low on power.

                  I have a 5.3 4x4 with a Radix and it makes 388hp and 424tq at the wheels,
                  before the Radix it made 225hp and 255tq at the wheels in completely stock
                  trim with only 745miles on it since new.
                  Was my truck really that low on power?

                  I remember the 6.0L was rated at 300fwhp back in 2000 when I bought it, so 230hp is about 76% or about 24% drivetrain loss... Isn't this about correct?
                  Old 08-07-2006, 11:02 PM
                    #17  
                  TECH Apprentice
                  iTrader: (1)
                   
                  LBSBLOWN's Avatar
                   
                  Join Date: May 2003
                  Location: Keller, TX
                  Posts: 339
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
                  Default

                  Originally Posted by BLASTER
                  Was my truck really that low on power?

                  I remember the 6.0L was rated at 300fwhp back in 2000 when I bought it, so 230hp is about 76% or about 24% drivetrain loss... Isn't this about correct?

                  Well I didn't think about that being a 2000 6.0 truck,
                  I know when I bought my 2005 5.3 rated at 300hp that the 6.0 was rated at 345hp in the Denali truck.
                  So maybe thats about right for your 6.0.
                  Old 08-07-2006, 11:14 PM
                    #18  
                  TECH Junkie
                  iTrader: (2)
                   
                  Join Date: Mar 2005
                  Location: Spring, TX
                  Posts: 3,197
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
                  Default

                  Originally Posted by LBSBLOWN
                  Well I didn't think about that being a 2000 6.0 truck,
                  I know when I bought my 2005 5.3 rated at 300hp that the 6.0 was rated at 345hp in the Denali truck.
                  So maybe thats about right for your 6.0.
                  His 6.0L is not the LQ9 6.0L.

                  Jim
                  Old 08-07-2006, 11:16 PM
                    #19  
                  TECH Junkie
                  iTrader: (2)
                   
                  Join Date: Mar 2005
                  Location: Spring, TX
                  Posts: 3,197
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
                  Post

                  Blaster that sucks man. I hope you get your finger on this one soon.
                  I can imagine how frustrating this is for you.
                  I feel for you man.

                  Jim
                  Old 08-10-2006, 09:53 PM
                    #20  
                  TECH Fanatic
                  Thread Starter
                  iTrader: (4)
                   
                  BLASTER's Avatar
                   
                  Join Date: Feb 2003
                  Location: bridgwater, nj
                  Posts: 1,528
                  Likes: 0
                  Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
                  Default

                  Originally Posted by CHEVY6000VHO
                  Blaster that sucks man. I hope you get your finger on this one soon.
                  I can imagine how frustrating this is for you.
                  I feel for you man.

                  Jim
                  tell me about it. At this point I just want to verify it's not the blower and go from there.

                  If it's top end related then I'll do a H/C swap but if it's bottom end then I just want to sell the blower and just go back to stock and give up.


                  Quick Reply: Radix numbers



                  All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 AM.