FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

Relocation of MAF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-2006, 10:13 PM
  #11  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
MikeGyver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 4,421
Received 199 Likes on 156 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Whippled 496
I want to ride in a truck that uses a radiator with a 4" hose.

Thats a big *** hose.
That's why Truck parts place starts with a capital t.

Originally Posted by Whippled 496
You could always use a DWV (drain waste vent) coupling from HD or Lowes. Should be fine for the intake side.
Oh, yeah, good idea.
Old 07-13-2006, 08:30 PM
  #12  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
MikeGyver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 4,421
Received 199 Likes on 156 Posts
Default Test: mechanical failure

Sorry, fellers, I have some more reconfiguring to do. I tried using the stock airbox-to-MAF rubber piece, I guess just to confirm that I am a dumbass. It doesn't really put any clamping pressure on the MAF using my aluminum adapter. Maybe the plastic of the airbox gives enough to clamp harder on the MAF, but probably not because my setup was OK up to 3 psi. It was kind of funny, actually. It reminded me of the relief valve on a steam boiler opening. I should have been in a parade. mmmmmrrrRRRRRRPSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSTRRRRrrrrrrrrrrr. And then when it came off completely, I shut the key off in a split second. It sounded like a tornado siren winding down. Everybody should yank the pressure tubing off of their twin screw just to hear it.
I have to find a 4" coupler locally like our 3" silicone ones, but I'd be happy with radiator hose-type material. I have to remake the MAF inlet adapter to the same OD as the MAF, instead of the same as the airbox.
Old 07-14-2006, 11:10 PM
  #13  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
MikeGyver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 4,421
Received 199 Likes on 156 Posts
Default Runs like crap.

I got a 4" silicone coupler at the Truck parts place. I saw boost go up one time, one psi, to 8. It never did it again. Strange. The truck runs like crap, I think it might be lean. 65.24 lbs./min. MAF, 103% injector duty cycle, O2 mV 955, all peak numbers. Does higher mV mean leaner? I sent the logs to Mr. Nelson, I'll let you know what he tells me.
Old 07-15-2006, 12:10 AM
  #14  
Destroyer of Transmissions
iTrader: (28)
 
1SlowHoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 4,962
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

955mv is rich. I think you should be in the 920-930 range for boosted engines. And thats on the high, safe side. (From what I've read anyway) I was running 860mv ( I think thats what it was) when I lunched a few pistons
Old 07-15-2006, 03:38 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Whippled 496's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lake Shore, MD
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mikegyver
I got a 4" silicone coupler at the Truck parts place. I saw boost go up one time, one psi, to 8. It never did it again. Strange. The truck runs like crap, I think it might be lean. 65.24 lbs./min. MAF, 103% injector duty cycle, O2 mV 955, all peak numbers. Does higher mV mean leaner? I sent the logs to Mr. Nelson, I'll let you know what he tells me.

Think its the MAF? Put it back to stock location and see if it changes.
Old 07-15-2006, 05:28 PM
  #16  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
MikeGyver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 4,421
Received 199 Likes on 156 Posts
Default

I'd have to cut and reweld the I/C-to-engine tube to move it again. I'm going to limp around with it like this until I get a definitive answer.
Old 07-15-2006, 10:16 PM
  #17  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
MikeGyver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 4,421
Received 199 Likes on 156 Posts
Default

It did it again tonight. All of a sudden, at like 75 or 80, the boost shot up to 8 1/2 psi from 7. Runs good at that boost. It also is running a little better at the end of tonight's trip than at the start, 85 miles round trip. If nothing else, this probably, but not scientifically, proves that the MAF is a restriction. Everything downstream of the supercharger is tight, I guess I'll try wiring the bypass closed temporarily to test it tomorrow. ?????!
Old 07-18-2006, 08:35 PM
  #18  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
MikeGyver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 4,421
Received 199 Likes on 156 Posts
Default

It was way too rich, running better, needs further adjustment.

Allen Nelson, at http://www.nelsonperformance.com is really bringing this thing to life.
Old 07-21-2006, 11:13 AM
  #19  
Staging Lane
 
04ChargedSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tri Valley area, NorCal
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hmmm, I wonder........If the MAF in the stock position measures "uncharged" air flow to tell the engine what fuel to pump, wouldn't it seem logical that more air (charged air) through the MAF would tell the engine to pump more fuel? I'm not sure that would work to well in the long run. IMO.
Old 07-21-2006, 05:19 PM
  #20  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
MikeGyver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 4,421
Received 199 Likes on 156 Posts
Default

Please simplify your post so that I can fully understand it.


Quick Reply: Relocation of MAF



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 PM.