roots vs screw vs centrifugal
#21
There isn't much question that a propely sized turbo will make the most power. Even in the stronger streetable applications the turbo may only take away 10hp or so compared to 60 - 75 for a centrifugal supercharger...even more for roots/twin-screws. There turbo system available for my truck makes boost at only 1900 rpm and makes full boost at 2500. Coupled with a FMIC that is 98% efficient the power just can't be matched with a blower. Guy who made the kit dyno'd 425/535 @ 8psi. Almost 70hp over a centrifugal at the same pressure.
#22
Originally Posted by GMC_DUDE
We know that already, that's what is meant by the term *modified* roots. But a new term, *hybrid* had been added here, which has not been used before. Now "hybrid" generally means a combination of two different things, like a hybrid car is a combination of a gasoline and an electric. So my question here is: What constitutes the hybrid? I presume one part is the roots blower, modified as described above. But what is the other part?
#23
Originally Posted by Blown330
There isn't much question that a propely sized turbo will make the most power. Even in the stronger streetable applications the turbo may only take away 10hp or so compared to 60 - 75 for a centrifugal supercharger...even more for roots/twin-screws. There turbo system available for my truck makes boost at only 1900 rpm and makes full boost at 2500. Coupled with a FMIC that is 98% efficient the power just can't be matched with a blower. Guy who made the kit dyno'd 425/535 @ 8psi. Almost 70hp over a centrifugal at the same pressure.
also, where did you get that 98% I/C effiecency number from? and what type of I/C'ing are you referring too?
#25
That FMIC is a custom dual-pass made for the F-150's. Datalogging during dyno tuning showed near ambient temps at the throttle body. I'm working on doing some of my own datalogging with an LM-1 to figure out compressor and intercooler efficiencies for my truck.
#26
Originally Posted by Blown330
That FMIC is a custom dual-pass made for the F-150's. Datalogging during dyno tuning showed near ambient temps at the throttle body. I'm working on doing some of my own datalogging with an LM-1 to figure out compressor and intercooler efficiencies for my truck.
#27
Originally Posted by jephs422
Anyway back on topic. I looked at the options about 2 years ago, and this is my decision path. The 4.8 had OK power above 4000 RPM, but needed help in the low end. Since nearly all my driving is below 2500 RPM, that pretty much ruled out centrifugals. So my choice was Magnuson, Whipple, or Kenne Bell. At that time KB offered pretty much a blower, period. No injectors, no tune , no intercooler, etc.. Plus people were having customer support issues, so I put them at the bottom of the list. At first I was going to go with Whipple, but their piggy-back fuel enrichment system made me suspicious, and after asking their customer support a question, I was even less favorable towards them. I have heard that they have since changed, so you might want to check into them. That left Magnuson and the Radix. I won't sing their praises here, as that's been done enough elsewhere. I did have to swallow hard about coughing up $5000, but rationalized that it's better to pay a lot and get it done right the first time. It went in with only a few glitches, the worst being the fuel pump ('04 and newer trucks won't have this problem). I have been very pleased with its performance, as has nearly everyone else who has driven my truck.
At the time, STS wasn't out yet, so it didn't factor. However, I myself would still probably not go that route because: 1: I can't weld. 2: I wanted a complete kit if possible, so there would be no finger pointing if things went wrong. 3: I wanted the most low-end torque possible.
Hope this helps you in making your decision.
#29
Originally Posted by Blown330
No it's and air-to-air front mount.