tc78 1.52
10-08-2013, 01:56 PM
#11
And the s475 is only $50 more in the same configuration. T4 to t6 adapter and you wouldn't have to change up your hot pipe either.
10-16-2013, 05:06 PM
#14
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: slidell, LA
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
call jose @ forcedinductions.com. You need at least a 75mm turbine, but personally I would run the 92/84mm turbine. BW advertises their turbines based on the inducer when most other companies base it on the exducer. The exducer is more important bc it's the bottle neck. The BW turbines are 83/75, 92/84, and 96/88. They also have the TM1 but you wont need that. I would say go T6 but if you want to stay T4 go with the s475 92mm turbine and biggest ar you can. For T6 Id say s475 92mm turbine and 1.10 ar. You could also opt for the s480 compressor, it will spool a tiny bit slower but with your displacement it may be what you want depending on how much hp you want. You really should do some math and look at the two compressor maps and see which one would be more efficient for your goals
10-17-2013, 09:41 AM
#16
call jose @ forcedinductions.com. You need at least a 75mm turbine, but personally I would run the 92/84mm turbine. BW advertises their turbines based on the inducer when most other companies base it on the exducer. The exducer is more important bc it's the bottle neck. The BW turbines are 83/75, 92/84, and 96/88. They also have the TM1 but you wont need that. I would say go T6 but if you want to stay T4 go with the s475 92mm turbine and biggest ar you can. For T6 Id say s475 92mm turbine and 1.10 ar. You could also opt for the s480 compressor, it will spool a tiny bit slower but with your displacement it may be what you want depending on how much hp you want. You really should do some math and look at the two compressor maps and see which one would be more efficient for your goals
10-17-2013, 10:20 AM
#17
There is a HUGE difference between a T-netics with a 78mm compressor and a 68mm turbine, vs a BW with a 75mm compressor and a 83/75mm turbine. I have have this BW with the race cover and have made about 750rwhp with it at 15psi on a 6L, Stock48 I believe has ran one at about 22psi and maxed it out about 900 or so I think. The BW flows a ton more air then a T-netics.
10-17-2013, 10:33 AM
#18
There is a HUGE difference between a T-netics with a 78mm compressor and a 68mm turbine, vs a BW with a 75mm compressor and a 83/75mm turbine. I have have this BW with the race cover and have made about 750rwhp with it at 15psi on a 6L, Stock48 I believe has ran one at about 22psi and maxed it out about 900 or so I think. The BW flows a ton more air then a T-netics.
Last edited by LS1FREEK; 10-17-2013 at 11:33 AM.
10-17-2013, 11:19 AM
#20
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: slidell, LA
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm running that same turbo and it's insane! Wouldn't say better than a bw but it has big housings so it flows a lot!
It was a night and day difference when I went from the on3 76/64 small housing (small frame like turbinetics) and went to the cx gt45 80/77.5 with big frame. It's actually the same exact turbo magnum sells for $1150 but it's only $600
It was a night and day difference when I went from the on3 76/64 small housing (small frame like turbinetics) and went to the cx gt45 80/77.5 with big frame. It's actually the same exact turbo magnum sells for $1150 but it's only $600
Last edited by o2camaross; 10-17-2013 at 11:25 AM.