Tell me why the LPE cams are so popular for the Radix
#21
Moderately Differentiated
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by moregrip
I'm at work now, when I get home I'll check to see if I still have them. I maaay have sent BC(can't remember) a pic of the graph if you want it sooner.
#22
what a rush!
iTrader: (8)
Originally Posted by dewmanshu
grippy i have the software here, if you have the file (.dyn) I can help ya. Hell, if you don't mind sharing your hard work, I'd like to see it anyway, ESPECIALLY your built 6.0/radix.
#25
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
Originally Posted by moregrip
here's a 5.3, GT2-3, Radix, Stock Heads, 8lbs of boost:
subtract 5% error for the program, and then your corresponding driveline loss
subtract 5% error for the program, and then your corresponding driveline loss
Am I reading thiss correct. 725hp - 5% - DT loss 30% = 482hp? I'd be happy with that.
Oops! I see I missed the RPMs down there, Damn! More like 432@6000! Still not too shabby, add in a few mods and ......
#26
So I just spoke to Jeff at LPE and he recommended the GT2-3. He also told me that the GT7 was designed more for a turbo, with the smaller lift and longer exhause duration designed to increase exhaust velocity. I asked him about my current cam and how it was designed for a s/c and why his was better, and he told me that it was two different approaches and that the GT2-3 was designed to have better street manners and more usable power, and to give better torque down low, where a big truck needs it. He also said that LPE would never take the same approach as Vinci did with the Trucker (216/224-551/551-115) cam, anyone know why?
#27
TOTM: January 2007
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by thunder550
So I just spoke to Jeff at LPE and he recommended the GT2-3. He also told me that the GT7 was designed more for a turbo, with the smaller lift and longer exhause duration designed to increase exhaust velocity. I asked him about my current cam and how it was designed for a s/c and why his was better, and he told me that it was two different approaches and that the GT2-3 was designed to have better street manners and more usable power, and to give better torque down low, where a big truck needs it. He also said that LPE would never take the same approach as Vinci did with the Trucker (216/224-551/551-115) cam, anyone know why?
#29
TECH Veteran
Originally Posted by KySilverado
The GT2-3 is nearly identical to the custom grind Cam Motion I had in the 5.3. It pulled well also.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
therock
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
4
07-25-2015 09:23 AM