FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

Turbo Cam Spec?! WHP/Trq Est.?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2014, 10:59 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
1999Firehawkls7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Turbo Cam Spec?! WHP/Trq Est.?

I just got my Cam ordered from Martin @ Tick Performance
223/223 .617 .617 114+5

Details about Truck:
*2003 AWD SS Silverado*

Stock Long Block w Thicker Head Gaskets

Tick Custom Grind Cam (223/223 .617 .617 114+5)

Trick Performance Stage 1 Kit Intercooled (No Meth) 8-10lbs <Depends on how the Tuning goes (93 Pump Gas)

60lb Injectors

Yank 2800 Stall

Built 4l65e

Truck realisticly only needs 480-500 Wheel and as much Trq as I can get my sticky hands on

Stock Weight, Daily Driven

Really hope Im not taking the fun out of my Daily Vehical and leaning on it to hard, I do enjoy the Drivability of the Truck and its alot of fun thats for sure.
Old 02-14-2014, 09:04 AM
  #2  
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
03sierraslt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western PA
Posts: 19,004
Received 217 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Your trans won't like it, but depending on who built it and how it's built it may be ok for a bit. You should hit 500 whp without issue.
Old 02-16-2014, 11:06 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
1999Firehawkls7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The Trans will hold, its got every bad a$$ part in it money can buy lol
Old 02-16-2014, 11:22 PM
  #4  
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Vortec350ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Shore, MA
Posts: 7,271
Received 61 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Cam looks good from here.

Honestly the hp depends a hell of a lot more on the rest of the combo than the cam with a turbo. That said I see no reason you won't reach or exceed your goal of 500 wheel hp with a 10# turbo set up. And the stage 1 will spool really fast. I don't think it will have huge power capability with that turbo though.
Old 02-16-2014, 11:27 PM
  #5  
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
smokeshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 7,740
Received 204 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

Lol. It is funny to see his turbo cam duration shorten up by 12 to 15 degrees on both lobes over the past 8 months...
Old 02-17-2014, 01:03 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
oakley6575's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,235
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by smokeshow
Lol. It is funny to see his turbo cam duration shorten up by 12 to 15 degrees on both lobes over the past 8 months...
He must be reading the comments around the interwebz. I've never seen a turbo cam of his be under the 230's in duration.
Old 02-17-2014, 02:20 AM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
1999Firehawkls7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oakley6575
He must be reading the comments around the interwebz. I've never seen a turbo cam of his be under the 230's in duration.
I feel out of the loop here, is this a good thing for me or a bad thing?
Old 02-17-2014, 07:31 AM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
Chevy_King1500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Jasper, IN
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1999Firehawkls7
I feel out of the loop here, is this a good thing for me or a bad thing?
good, bigger than I would go, but it will perform good
Old 02-17-2014, 10:49 AM
  #9  
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
smokeshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 7,740
Received 204 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1999Firehawkls7
I feel out of the loop here, is this a good thing for me or a bad thing?
I wouldn't call it good....but relatively, it is better. Thanks to the hundreds of people before you that bought that guy's cams that he was still learning on. lol
Old 02-17-2014, 11:12 AM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by smokeshow
I wouldn't call it good....but relatively, it is better. Thanks to the hundreds of people before you that bought that guy's cams that he was still learning on. lol
Be nice now. He's an expert.

It was after I saw smokeshow's TT dyno with the triple 12 that I got fed up and swapped to that cam myself.

I knew from my experience on this forum years ago when small cams were the norm that for a street vehicle they make way more power under the curve in the daily rpm range. Hot Rod mag did a test on several cams in a stock 6.0 years ago. The difference in under the curve torque between the 210/218 and even the next size up, 216/224 (still considered a baby cam in a 6.0) was staggering.

JMO, the larger the size of cam you go on a street truck, the more of a compromise it is. Yes, you will still make great power on paper, but with the smaller cam you can have your cake and eat it too.


Quick Reply: Turbo Cam Spec?! WHP/Trq Est.?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 AM.