Were to get a intercooler for my whipple
11-27-2009 | 01:25 AM
#42
Man for not wanting to be argumentive you sure are.Then you rub it in with (Bad example).Before you discredit my statements make sure your right.
After the use of a clutch controlled kompressor on the 271.MB switched to a ECU controled BPV.Which how mine is currently is jus not ecu controlled its vacum referenced.
I am not some young kid that knows a little bit about PD blowers.I have spent almost 2yrs.researching and F-in with my setup and a few others to figure this out.By reseaching I mean couple hrs. every day on the net or in the garage tinkerin.It has taken me so long cause 1 Im self taught 2 I Have a terrible memory and have forgot more than I've learned3.I just don't have a lot of throw around money.The only thing I do have going for me is a good amount of determination.Its cool man cause all you guys do is fuel it with your nay say That's why I didn't post about till now I knew I would catch some flack.
After the use of a clutch controlled kompressor on the 271.MB switched to a ECU controled BPV.Which how mine is currently is jus not ecu controlled its vacum referenced.
I am not some young kid that knows a little bit about PD blowers.I have spent almost 2yrs.researching and F-in with my setup and a few others to figure this out.By reseaching I mean couple hrs. every day on the net or in the garage tinkerin.It has taken me so long cause 1 Im self taught 2 I Have a terrible memory and have forgot more than I've learned3.I just don't have a lot of throw around money.The only thing I do have going for me is a good amount of determination.Its cool man cause all you guys do is fuel it with your nay say That's why I didn't post about till now I knew I would catch some flack.
11-27-2009 | 04:15 AM
#43
Easy man, I am not saying ****. I am always interested in new thoughts. I was determined to make things work, where do you think the original intercooler twin screw thread came from? I am not saying I think it wouldn't work and I am not saying I think that it would work. However I do want to know more. By now you should have learned you are going to take flack because you own a Whipple, same here with my KB....
11-27-2009 | 03:27 PM
#47
I have the same setup a intercooled kenne bell.... and have some simular problems slow throttle response and poor idle.....
I'm thinking of using a speed density tune and takeing the maf out or moving it to the charged side of the intake so the engine is not responding off a reading so far the the engine
Does porting the intake of the charger and bigger throttle bodies make that big of a difference 10-15 hp
I'm thinking of using a speed density tune and takeing the maf out or moving it to the charged side of the intake so the engine is not responding off a reading so far the the engine
Does porting the intake of the charger and bigger throttle bodies make that big of a difference 10-15 hp
11-27-2009 | 09:45 PM
#48
I have the same setup a intercooled kenne bell.... and have some simular problems slow throttle response and poor idle.....
I'm thinking of using a speed density tune and takeing the maf out or moving it to the charged side of the intake so the engine is not responding off a reading so far the the engine
Does porting the intake of the charger and bigger throttle bodies make that big of a difference 10-15 hp
I'm thinking of using a speed density tune and takeing the maf out or moving it to the charged side of the intake so the engine is not responding off a reading so far the the engine
Does porting the intake of the charger and bigger throttle bodies make that big of a difference 10-15 hp
11-28-2009 | 12:10 PM
#49
It dies alot when coming to a hard stop or turning and braking........ I have a TH400 trans so the computer has no idea what the trans is doing anymore which is part of the problem