FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

what's the limit on stock bottom 5.3 ??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2011, 03:26 PM
  #41  
Teching In
 
russellisabel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ok for one if you look at the truck on streetfire.net he is using a single massive turbo. If anyone knows anything then they know that a single turbo makes more power per pound of boost than a supercharger thats belt driven from the crank. fact! second im using procharger p1c thats their basic street supercharger. so its not some hardcore dragstrip charger or massive turbo. there is also a huge diff in the power they genarate based on abient outside tempatures as well as turbo lag compared to a procharger. lets not compare turbos vs. supercharging on a power per boost level. I gained 126RWHP and only 53RWTRQ due to cam choice. my truck is also street tuned meaning i use it everyday, I chose not to do a track tune as its my daily crusier that also had to do with my choice of cam. however the thread was to show how relyable the stock bottom end is in a 5.3. im also only using 60lbs injectors where as i could go up to probally 75's. I just wanted to say the 5.3 is capable of alot not get into a pissing match.
Old 02-14-2011, 03:40 PM
  #42  
Mod with training wheels
iTrader: (16)
 
smokeshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 7,740
Received 204 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

That's why I gave you Bill's example as well...on a roots blower, even. A supercharger does make less power per pound of boost, but the difference is not 250lb-ft of torque. I just think your tune needs some work. If you are happy with it, then by all means, leave it as is.
Old 02-15-2011, 03:09 AM
  #43  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (4)
 
TURBHOE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Jacksonville FL.
Posts: 6,318
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

now i understand why alot of procharger guys go turbo in the end. i'd be pissed if 20psi only made 5XXwhp.

Last edited by TURBHOE; 02-15-2011 at 03:20 AM.
Old 02-15-2011, 07:15 AM
  #44  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
schino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: flemington nj
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Damn you guys are killing this dude. If he is happy with his truck as is then that's cool. Yeah it is a little lower then others but there are many more in the same boat as him I'm sure. Isn't blown chevy putting down relatively low numbers for his boost? Gotta remember these are dyno numbers and they don't always tell the truth. Id think a pd blower would make a lot more tq then the pro also. Def not making 20lbs across the board
Old 02-15-2011, 08:03 AM
  #45  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
1989k1500's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ravenna, MI
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by russellisabel
ok for one if you look at the truck on streetfire.net he is using a single massive turbo.

im also only using 60lbs injectors where as i could go up to probally 75's.
Its a 68mm turbo. Not a massive turbo at all.

And you have no need for bigger injectors unless you went to e85. 60s are way more than enough for 500rwhp. That black truck made almost 700whp on 60s with an 80e, 9.5" rear end, and 35" tires. If you put that stuff in your truck it probably wouldnt make 450 to the tires.
Old 03-02-2011, 01:51 PM
  #46  
Teching In
 
russellisabel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sorry I feel like an ***! I talked to my tunner and I'm running 15lbs.. not 20lbs.. what he said was if i wanted to go to 20 we would have to swap out the P1 to a D1.. my misunderstanding.. all of you were right and I apollagise..I don't like to bullshit anyone and try to keep it real so please accept my apologize.. so as it stands its 565RWHP at 15lbs.. and no matter what it is I think its great to have any kind of boost in our trucks. sorry again guys.
Old 03-02-2011, 01:55 PM
  #47  
Teching In
 
russellisabel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i also just changed my signature to reflect the correction also. its been changed to 15lbs. sorry everyone.
Old 03-02-2011, 03:36 PM
  #48  
Banned
iTrader: (27)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by russellisabel
i also just changed my signature to reflect the correction also. its been changed to 15lbs. sorry everyone.

thats one fun avalanche, hows it sound at idle. whistling like crazy
Old 03-02-2011, 04:54 PM
  #49  
Teching In
 
russellisabel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I love it, the smart people don't want to race or ask if I have a blower. but lately allot of dumb people come up to me and tell me my belts are squealing really loud. go figure.....
Old 03-02-2011, 05:11 PM
  #50  
Slowest turbo build ever!
iTrader: (2)
 
black00chev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Warrenton, VA
Posts: 2,905
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

20psi on a P1SC right? IF so then those numbers dont sound that bad really.


Quick Reply: what's the limit on stock bottom 5.3 ??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 PM.