which will give you more power with same PSI and motor.
#2
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Monterrey Mexico
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well don´t know much about which one will make more hp, what I can tell you is that the tvs will give the power at low rpms, and the paxton needs to get at least 3000-3500 up to make power, correct me if i´m wrong
#6
I tried my car with a car like mine but with 1900 and my car is way better than him, now the TVS2300 turn my head especially with those big numbers posted latelly.
some told me to switch to 2000 novi head unit and some told me to go with the TVS2300
some told me to switch to 2000 novi head unit and some told me to go with the TVS2300
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Addict
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: southern california
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
id have to say the centrifigal will have less parasitic loss . i agree though the tvs will make more boost under the curve , if pullied smaller the centri will make decent boost at lower rpms . i was able to make a couple psi on a launch @ 2800 rpms . id say for a track setup the paxton would win but for a street machine the tvs will own .
#9
OP, where do u spend most of your time?
I'd pick TVS no matter what, but that's me. Why be confined to a limited power band?
#10
TECH Veteran
I would have to say the 1500 would. The 1500 has less parasitic drag and doesn't sit right on top of the motor to soak up heat. The 1500 also doesn't have much problem with low rpm boost. We just recently tuned a 416 with a 1500 on it and it made plenty of boost down low. We've also recently tuned 2 vehicles with 2300's. Centrifugals are getting better and better as time goes on just as the Maggies are. Properly dialed in the centrifugal makes more than enough torque down low. The downside to them is how much room they take and all of the extra piping. For simplicity and how clean the engine compartment stays is why I would pick the Magnacharger over it.