FORCED INDUCTION Turbos | Superchargers | Intercoolers | H2O/Meth Injection

which will give you more power with same PSI and motor.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-25-2009, 09:24 AM
  #11  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
MoeDenali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thank you guys for the inputs.
I'll keep the 1500 and rise the boost to 10 PSI.
I'll try to keep it under 600hp range for many reasons and the most important is the tranny i don't know how much it will hold.
Old 07-25-2009, 09:25 AM
  #12  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
MoeDenali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zippy
I would have to say the 1500 would. The 1500 has less parasitic drag and doesn't sit right on top of the motor to soak up heat. The 1500 also doesn't have much problem with low rpm boost. We just recently tuned a 416 with a 1500 on it and it made plenty of boost down low. We've also recently tuned 2 vehicles with 2300's. Centrifugals are getting better and better as time goes on just as the Maggies are. Properly dialed in the centrifugal makes more than enough torque down low. The downside to them is how much room they take and all of the extra piping. For simplicity and how clean the engine compartment stays is why I would pick the Magnacharger over it.
I'm using ECS kit
Old 07-25-2009, 09:33 AM
  #13  
blownerator
iTrader: (20)
 
BlownChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1986
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 18,745
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

The TVS Still sees no more than 30* over ambient. Dont listen to the bull$**** about "heat" this and "heat" that. Read what 99% of the people are using and getting stellar results from.

The people that do not get good results do not have a compatible package. The people that do, did their research. I think Nelson's results of 650+ HP on a cam/blower LS3 speak for themselves.

Boost for Boost the average HP will be higher with a Magna Charger TVS, PERIOD.
Old 07-25-2009, 11:25 AM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
old motorhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SE TEXAS
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by BlownChevy
The TVS Still sees no more than 30* over ambient. Dont listen to the bull$**** about "heat" this and "heat" that. Read what 99% of the people are using and getting stellar results from.

The people that do not get good results do not have a compatible package. The people that do, did their research. I think Nelson's results of 650+ HP on a cam/blower LS3 speak for themselves.

Boost for Boost the average HP will be higher with a Magna Charger TVS, PERIOD.
Brian, I've read your post several times and I'm not exactly sure where you stand on the issue. You need to be a little less wishy washy and state what your really think.
Old 07-25-2009, 11:50 AM
  #15  
blownerator
iTrader: (20)
 
BlownChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1986
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 18,745
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by old motorhead
Brian, I've read your post several times and I'm not exactly sure where you stand on the issue. You need to be a little less wishy washy and state what your really think.
LOL, yeah maybe I should be more direct.
Old 07-25-2009, 12:56 PM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
fastnblu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by MoeDenali
Thank you guys for the inputs.
I'll keep the 1500 and rise the boost to 10 PSI.
...
You never stated you already own 1 of the 2 s/c in question.

Originally Posted by BlownChevy
The TVS Still sees no more than 30* over ambient. Dont listen to the bullshit about "heat" this and "heat" that. Read what 99% of the people are using and getting stellar results from.

The people that do not get good results do not have a compatible package. The people that do, did their research. I think Nelson's results of 650+ HP on a cam/blower LS3 speak for themselves.

Boost for Boost the average HP will be higher with a Magna Charger TVS, PERIOD.
99%, huh? Were those results taken by an unbiased 3rd party?

So Brian, you're sayin a turbo would be the way to go?!?
Old 07-25-2009, 03:09 PM
  #17  
TECH Resident
 
MNC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WJ MARK
tvs. Centri's oly make good power with a big stall and high RPM'd
I don't agree, a properly setup Centrifugal will make solid power and can be as fast or faster than a roots or twin screw with a mild stall. On a truck I'd opt for the roots but on car that isn't a daily driver the Centrifugal has proven to be a faster package so far anyway.

But you don't get factory support with a Centrifugal like you do with a Magna Charger.
Old 07-25-2009, 04:07 PM
  #18  
blownerator
iTrader: (20)
 
BlownChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1986
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 18,745
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fastnblu
You never stated you already own 1 of the 2 s/c in question.



99%, huh? Were those results taken by an unbiased 3rd party?

So Brian, you're sayin a turbo would be the way to go?!?
read what I said faulkface....99% of the people USING them......That means CUSTOMERS....
Old 07-25-2009, 11:58 PM
  #19  
TECH Veteran
 
zippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

A piece of TVS2300 info. We just finished a 2008 G8 GT at work and made 552RWHP with it. That was on 8psi with 91 octane and the DA was 6900 when we were on the dyno with it. Some interesting info though was the way it picked up power. When we first ran the car it made 5psi and when from 400RWHP to just over 450RWHP tuned in fairly well. Moving the boost up to a point where the blower was more efficient is where we picked up right about 100RWHP. That's right, going from 5psi to 8psi gained us right about 100RWHP and there may have been a bit more left on the table, but the timing was at a respectable point for the compression/boost/octane level we were working with. The TVS doesn't have the heat issue's of the past Magnacharger's. Driving around the G8 today I seen IAT's in the 140's in traffic with outside temps somewhere at about 100. As soon as you would get outside of traffic it would drop temps enough to bring a smile to your face (about 10-15 over ambient). Other than being a huge piece of aluminum that is bolted right to the top of the motor where heat rises (there is no getting around that fact) nobody should be seeing high IAT's with a TVS2300 unless they really are over working it. After all blowers just like turbo's aren't a one size fit's all. Although the TVS2300 is being advertised as the answer for big inch motors I feel that the 6.0L and 6.2L's that get them will really be using that blower at it's best. Keep an eye out there for more big number TVS2300's from the L76's and LS3's.

http://forum.grrrr8.net/showthread.php?t=8939
Old 07-28-2009, 04:20 AM
  #20  
GFYS and STFU
iTrader: (8)
 
Spoolin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Here and sometimes there too.
Posts: 13,870
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I saw that vid of the G8 zippy, good work!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OHsixLS3
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
14
12-27-2016 09:30 AM
05GMC4.8
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion
5
08-07-2015 09:55 PM
V-seriesTech
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
7
07-28-2015 12:31 PM
steves86ta
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
07-28-2015 10:21 AM



Quick Reply: which will give you more power with same PSI and motor.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 AM.