Atomic

iTrader: (42)

Jon at FIC always sends me all the data I need, and if I dont see something I just call him and he gets it to me right then.

As an aside, I think people put too much weight in injector data...meaning that close is usually good enough. These are not magic devices, there will be some mechanical error and variance at all times, so arguing about 0.01ms is pointless. Also if the airflow tuning was not perfect before, its not going to be perfect after swapping injectors, so dont just assume the injector data is wrong. Idle is the most crucial spot for injector data, and luckily its very hard to hurt an engine at idle.

slowec

iTrader: (9)

FIC provides data and did not change my a/f ratio at all. no tuning , just plugged in the new ifr data into efilive and roll out!

smokeshow

iTrader: (16)

I think at this point I'd take close data over bad data...lol. In reality, 0.01ms doesn't really matter, but when the whole offset table is skewed by amounts of that magnitude...it messes with stuff

To answer the original question, most people who vehemently promote FIC or ID injectors will look down on SD stuff...but I've had no issues with SD 60s or 80s.

nonnieselman

iTrader: (10)

Check your email corey

BlackGMC

iTrader: (31)

I have not got an email. try sending it to corey_lemons@sbcglobal.net

nonnieselman

iTrader: (10)

corey lemons <corey_lemons@sbcglobal.net>;

Thats where i sent it.. hum..
I tried it again.

BlackGMC

iTrader: (31)

I got them, sweet! that is exactly what i was looking for! Thank you.