FUEL SYSTEMS For things such as pumps, lines, set-ups, line routing, fuel cell mounting, etc.,etc....all fuel related discussions!

Question about rail plumbing for return conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2015, 10:26 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
lxcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default Question about rail plumbing for return conversion

I'm curious about everyones opinions on plumbing the return rails. My particular application is a 2005 Silverado which I am turbo'ing and will be running E85 and ID1000's. I've read that I can Y and run two individual hoses to the back of the rails then run each rail to the regulator (preferred way). But that is a plumbing headache

What will be much easier is if I run the -8 feed to the rear of the driver's side rail, then run the passenger side rail to the regulator and cap the 2nd port on the regulator (and obviously run a crossover at the front of the rail).

Anyone have an opinion either way?

"Preferred way"



My way (top):

Old 11-10-2015, 11:05 PM
  #2  
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
BlackGMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Worth - TX
Posts: 17,216
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

I tired the "preferred" way, i did not like it... it cost a small fortune in fittings... Way to complicated... It did work fine thou... I ended up swapping to the setup you have pictured second... It was kinda fun to make but simpler is always better. I have also tried the dead head way too, no issues with that either...

Name:  98C7DADC-DDF7-4B06-BA2C-AE1A47BC4B15_zpsynulpiwy.jpg
Views: 1264
Size:  96.1 KB

Name:  BCFA8814-76EC-4129-8CFD-AD5EC23FFAD9_zpsjdblemtx.jpg
Views: 933
Size:  103.5 KB

Name:  13194A3D-A8DF-40B9-AAE3-D9020F1B8ADF_zpssjrhxfim.jpg
Views: 763
Size:  121.6 KB
Old 11-10-2015, 11:28 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
lxcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Corey big thanks! Always nice to hear what's proven. I have literally stalled my project by weeks by cutting, refitting, maneuvering y fittings so I can somehow plumb them into each side, etc etc. I have several hundred dollars in fittings that I still need to return. I will run it the simple way pictured second. F**k the truck would be running had I not over thought this.
Old 11-10-2015, 11:38 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Running a feed to each rail is one of those things that seems preferred in theory but really doesn't make anything difference versus doing a crossover at our power levels.

The most important thing is to have the regulator after the rails.
Old 11-11-2015, 06:48 AM
  #5  
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
03sierraslt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western PA
Posts: 19,004
Received 217 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

I have mine ran like the 2nd picture.
Old 11-11-2015, 11:44 AM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
 
TrendSetter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

i have had great luck with the last layout, dead heading. I dont have a choice though because im running a oem returnless fuel rail.
Old 11-11-2015, 12:23 PM
  #7  
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
BlackGMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Worth - TX
Posts: 17,216
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Just my opinion on the dead heading option is to have regulator as close to the rails as possible. When i had that setup it was only ~6in away. Seemed to work fine for me. But option 2 is the easiest and is proven.
Old 11-11-2015, 12:28 PM
  #8  
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
BlackGMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Worth - TX
Posts: 17,216
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

One other thing is testing the system. Buy the testers they are cheap. Cap off the feed and return at the bucket. Pressurize the whole system with 100psi with compressed air. Get a squirt bottle with soapie water and spray every fitting and injector. If you get bubbles then You have a leak.
Old 11-11-2015, 01:29 PM
  #9  
I have a gauge for that
iTrader: (42)
 
Atomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 16,253
Received 377 Likes on 257 Posts
Default

^ dont be a wuss, smoke a cigar and just pressurize with gasoline


I have done both both ways, liked the second way better. Pumps to back of one rail, crossover, then end of other rail to regulator.
Old 11-11-2015, 02:58 PM
  #10  
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Vortec350ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Shore, MA
Posts: 7,271
Received 61 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

When I finally kick my *** into gear I will do option 2...


Quick Reply: Question about rail plumbing for return conversion



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 AM.