3.73 to 4.56
#33
11 Second Truck Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I already did, 3600 is as loose as he can get a PT and I can't go smaller cause I had this converter custom made to make my flt 4l60e work with my 2000 lq4 crank flange.
Last edited by MPFD; 05-10-2010 at 06:54 PM.
#34
11 Second Truck Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s177/MPFD/dyno.jpg
There is the graph... Thats an unlocked converter stabbed at about 3000 in third.
if you put my track times and the fact that my truck weighs 4600 with me and 1/2 tank of fuel into stupid internet HP calculators it says it should be about 385-390 to the rear wheels...
There is the graph... Thats an unlocked converter stabbed at about 3000 in third.
if you put my track times and the fact that my truck weighs 4600 with me and 1/2 tank of fuel into stupid internet HP calculators it says it should be about 385-390 to the rear wheels...
Last edited by MPFD; 05-10-2010 at 06:55 PM.
#36
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (13)
with the heads you have and assuming your cam is fairly healty, you're probably making close to 400rwhp, or should be...something isn't right brotha. i can see narrowing it down to your 60' times if your mph was higher. but with the 60' you have, that mph is pretty much dead on for the et.
for instance, black04silverado or what ever, has a stock lq4 with a 230s duration cam, stock 317 heads, 3600 verter and 4.10s and run 13.10 @102...and even his tune wasn't spot on supposedly
for instance, black04silverado or what ever, has a stock lq4 with a 230s duration cam, stock 317 heads, 3600 verter and 4.10s and run 13.10 @102...and even his tune wasn't spot on supposedly