Notices
GM Drivetrain & Suspension Chassis | Transmission| Driveshaft | Gears/Rear End/Differential | Traction Aids

4.56 vs 4.10 gears for MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2010, 05:22 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
xsports33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Maui
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 4.56 vs 4.10 gears for MPG

I already have 4.56 gears and i'm debating on installing some 4.10s to get better MPG. With the Radix i have plenty of power so i'm not too concerned with loosing power off the line.

I'll be driving across the country, from San Diego to Chicago, about 6 times in the next year slowly moving into a new house. At least 2 of those times i'll be towing a boat or a trailer. Also, i average about 70% highway driving normally.

How much of an MPG increase do you think i'll gain going with the taller gears? You think its worth it?
Old 04-20-2010, 09:51 AM
  #2  
Moderator
iTrader: (19)
 
TXsilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Humble Texas
Posts: 18,318
Received 226 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

with 35" tires i would keep the 4.56.
Old 04-20-2010, 10:05 AM
  #3  
On The Tree
 
Z'06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXsilverado
with 35" tires i would keep the 4.56.
I agree, especially since you have to do 2 axles being 4WD. You would pick up a bit of highway MPG, at the expense of lowering your city mileage, plus your lower ratio (4.56) is going to put less wear and tear on your transmission and engine. Just leave it alone.

You might consider upgrading your air intake to either an AEM Brute Force or a K&N to pick up a little more HP/torque/potential MPG. Black Bear tested a bunch of air intakes awhile back, and those two came out on top of everyone else in terms of airflow/HP/torque, with the AEM having a slight edge over the K&N.
Old 04-20-2010, 10:47 AM
  #4  
Moderator
iTrader: (19)
 
TXsilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Humble Texas
Posts: 18,318
Received 226 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z'06
Black Bear tested a bunch of air intakes awhile back, and those two came out on top of everyone else in terms of airflow/HP/torque, with the AEM having a slight edge over the K&N.
where is that thread?
Old 04-20-2010, 03:26 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
 
Z'06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXsilverado
where is that thread?
I've seen it around a few different forums. Here is one.
Old 04-20-2010, 06:07 PM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
xsports33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Maui
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z'06
I agree, especially since you have to do 2 axles being 4WD. You would pick up a bit of highway MPG, at the expense of lowering your city mileage, plus your lower ratio (4.56) is going to put less wear and tear on your transmission and engine. Just leave it alone.

You might consider upgrading your air intake to either an AEM Brute Force or a K&N to pick up a little more HP/torque/potential MPG. Black Bear tested a bunch of air intakes awhile back, and those two came out on top of everyone else in terms of airflow/HP/torque, with the AEM having a slight edge over the K&N.
i don't think a different CAI is going to make that much of a difference over my Volant. Probably if i still had the stock airbox. Thanks though
Old 04-20-2010, 06:59 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
 
Z'06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xsports33
i don't think a different CAI is going to make that much of a difference over my Volant. Probably if i still had the stock airbox. Thanks though
Probably not, LOL. Just hate to see anyone make the investment to move one whole step (or less, like a 4.30 ratio) during a gear swap. Usually makes more sense to move two whole steps (like to 3.73, but that would really kill your city mileage and off-the-line power, in addition to putting added strain on your engine and tranny).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Raggedz71
TOWING & OFFROAD PERFORMANCE
3
07-29-2016 10:20 AM
silverstreak07
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
6
06-28-2016 06:29 PM
Noah Burns
GMT K2xx Trucks General Discussion
12
10-05-2015 06:46 AM
livefast1
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
4
09-25-2015 07:31 PM
So.cal Wrk Sled
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
2
07-26-2015 12:10 AM



Quick Reply: 4.56 vs 4.10 gears for MPG



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 AM.