4L60E/4L65E is built (by me)
#11
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
Originally Posted by Black02Z71
I adjusted the 1-2 table by -10 in the lower torque range, that made a big difference. I think if I pull a little more it will be close to stock. I've even been thinking of adding a little TM just at low torque.
After doing the logging above I went deeper into the torque numbers and wound up here. Damn near perfect for me now. Wish could post the tables clearly.
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560 600 640
32 F -28 -29 -31 -32 -32 -25 -20 -15 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 5 6
98 F -27 -28 -31 -32 -32 -25 -20 -15 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 7
167F -25 -26 -30 -33 -33 -25 -20 -15 0 0 0 0 1 2 5 7 8
233F 7 6 1 -4 -4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 6 8 9
302F 10 8 2 -6 -6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 7 9 10
#12
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
250-330 ft lbs that radix sure makes a lot of torque down low. What torque are you logging, I was logging delivered engine TQ, ands its only 180-200 ft lbs on mine (2100-2200 rpm at 1-2 shift).
#13
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
Originally Posted by Black02Z71
250-330 ft lbs that radix sure makes a lot of torque down low. What torque are you logging, I was logging delivered engine TQ, ands its only 180-200 ft lbs on mine (2100-2200 rpm at 1-2 shift).
Logged one 525 at 100% throttle, 3rd gear at 80mph. Was logging part throttle stuff. Never ran a WOT run... gonna have to try it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post