GM Drivetrain & Suspension Chassis | Transmission| Driveshaft | Gears/Rear End/Differential | Traction Aids

4l60e review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-2018 | 11:38 PM
  #1  
Robber16's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default 4l60e review

Looking for everyone’s honest opinion on the 4l60e. How many miles/km is everyone getting out of theirs? Can they hold more power than stock? Any common problems? Thanks!
Old 01-12-2018 | 12:00 AM
  #2  
FFDP's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5,235
Likes: 567
From: Rogers, MN
Default

They are good yet garbage at the same time, it just all depends on how it's used.

GM built them to last a long while in a daily use application and nobody can say otherwise. It was the main transmission for 15+ years and has been proven to go 100-150k miles on the regular or well higher. Then at the same time they can be a problem but that's with any mass produced product. What did they make like 300,000-500,000 half ton trucks a year?

Google the common problem, they have a ton of them. Clutch failures, drums, slipping etc etc. They can handle more power than stock but generally they do not last because of peoples driving style. The more it is abused the quicker it fails, tons of 3-1 or 4-2 downshifts and things like that will just wear it out and break something. Buying a built 4L60e isn't cheap but doing itself saves money or most just jump ship to the 3x stronger 4L80e and stop caring.
Old 01-12-2018 | 12:24 AM
  #3  
Robber16's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FFDP
They are good yet garbage at the same time, it just all depends on how it's used.

GM built them to last a long while in a daily use application and nobody can say otherwise. It was the main transmission for 15+ years and has been proven to go 100-150k miles on the regular or well higher. Then at the same time they can be a problem but that's with any mass produced product. What did they make like 300,000-500,000 half ton trucks a year?

Google the common problem, they have a ton of them. Clutch failures, drums, slipping etc etc. They can handle more power than stock but generally they do not last because of peoples driving style. The more it is abused the quicker it fails, tons of 3-1 or 4-2 downshifts and things like that will just wear it out and break something. Buying a built 4L60e isn't cheap but doing itself saves money or most just jump ship to the 3x stronger 4L80e and stop caring.
Makes sense, I can see how driving style and preventative maintenance can make a huge difference on the life span of a vehicle. Thanks for the quick reply.
Old 01-12-2018 | 09:45 AM
  #4  
darkirish63's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 640
Likes: 46
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by FFDP
They are good yet garbage at the same time, it just all depends on how it's used.

GM built them to last a long while in a daily use application and nobody can say otherwise. It was the main transmission for 15+ years and has been proven to go 100-150k miles on the regular or well higher. Then at the same time they can be a problem but that's with any mass produced product. What did they make like 300,000-500,000 half ton trucks a year?

Google the common problem, they have a ton of them. Clutch failures, drums, slipping etc etc. They can handle more power than stock but generally they do not last because of peoples driving style. The more it is abused the quicker it fails, tons of 3-1 or 4-2 downshifts and things like that will just wear it out and break something. Buying a built 4L60e isn't cheap but doing itself saves money or most just jump ship to the 3x stronger 4L80e and stop caring.
My stock 60e behind my 4.8 with mild bolt ons was perfect. I never had it serviced until I hit 110k. Once I dropped in the first stroker, however, even though I had it beefed up, it bit the dust...twice. Behind a mildly moded stock motors a 60e is pretty solid in my experience but once you start approaching higher HP and torque it just can' take it.
Old 01-12-2018 | 07:12 PM
  #5  
turboal1's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 672
Likes: 11
Default 60e

8 yrs,42000mi behind the mild 5.3 with bolt ons,
about 6500mi behind the cammed 6.2 so far.
It's my DD and trailer tow vehicle. it has been
adjusted when eng was dyno tuned.
NO prob so far, but my truck is under 4100lbs.
and i don't drive like a mad man.
Old 01-14-2018 | 11:53 AM
  #6  
stroker87's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 69
From: Chicago area
Default

130k with a bone stock 4.8 well it did does have a CAI lol

stock HP grampa behind the wheel with maintenance 300k, HP upgrades & aggressive driving ticking time bomb might last a week might last 10 years hard to say!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LOW2000
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
11
01-30-2004 02:10 PM
Chingon
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
6
10-27-2003 06:46 PM
hodgeee
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
12
08-25-2003 09:49 AM
bigguy75inches
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
13
06-26-2003 03:31 PM
hodgeee
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
8
04-14-2003 04:12 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25 AM.