4L80E fill level
#14
well i thought it was because of useing a 4l80 tube and 4l60 dipstick.
from my top mark is only maybe 1/8-1/4 to where the valve body is bolted up, so i figured if im at the full mark im doing good
from my top mark is only maybe 1/8-1/4 to where the valve body is bolted up, so i figured if im at the full mark im doing good
#17
#18
From my perspective the tube and dipstick hashes are irrelevant. After trans install, pull the pan off with the tube and dipstick installed and mark the dipstick at the level of the interface of the case and pan. This is the new "full" line. Some even advocate 0.5 qt over this mark. This is an absolutely critical aspect of install. I've read people speculate the reason GM put the full mark lower was to avoid the trans puking fluid and starting a fire. A stock vehicle won't see the G-forces a heavily modded one will hence no issues with fluid starvation with the lower level.
#19
From my perspective the tube and dipstick hashes are irrelevant. After trans install, pull the pan off with the tube and dipstick installed and mark the dipstick at the level of the interface of the case and pan. This is the new "full" line. Some even advocate 0.5 qt over this mark. This is an absolutely critical aspect of install. I've read people speculate the reason GM put the full mark lower was to avoid the trans puking fluid and starting a fire. A stock vehicle won't see the G-forces a heavily modded one will hence no issues with fluid starvation with the lower level.