Notices
GM Drivetrain & Suspension Chassis | Transmission| Driveshaft | Gears/Rear End/Differential | Traction Aids

Do I really need a 4l80e?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-29-2016, 08:29 AM
  #11  
formerly Emmerich 5.3 (2013-11-30)
iTrader: (5)
 
EmmerichLSx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm around 500 on motor before the nitrous. I still have 3.73's with an 80e and 3k stall. It is quite a bit harder to brake em loose going from the 60e. I have a set of 4.30's I need to install.
Old 02-29-2016, 01:33 PM
  #12  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
badream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXsilverado
I have a real 60e for sale in the classifieds.
Do ya?
Old 02-29-2016, 01:38 PM
  #13  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
badream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXsilverado
I have a real 60e for sale in the classifieds.
Just saw your post. That may be more than i need haha.
Old 02-29-2016, 01:43 PM
  #14  
Moderator
iTrader: (19)
 
TXsilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Humble Texas
Posts: 18,318
Received 226 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by badream
Just saw your post. That may be more than i need haha.
if you buy it new from FLT, your looking near the $6k mark. there's no point in building a 60e if you don't put every part into it IMO
Old 02-29-2016, 02:35 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
GMCtrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 12,275
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

I would never put an 80 for what you're describing.
Old 02-29-2016, 03:16 PM
  #16  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (18)
 
kazfan30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GMCtrk
I would never put an 80 for what you're describing.
I totally agree... ive put 643hp through a built 60e and ran 11s on a stock 60e before i lost 3/4 clutches.. I personally HATE an 80e gearing and the power it saps.. Yes it stronger but most dont need it!! I hear all the time... "I killed my 60e when my truck was stock!" Well...if you are tearing up trannys on stock or mild setups then look in the mirror.. you FOUND the problem.
Old 02-29-2016, 04:11 PM
  #17  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
badream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im just so used to my T56 in my GTO.....Car makes 470 rwhp and im on my stock tranny. And have been for 15k miles. Different clutch of course.
Old 02-29-2016, 04:23 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Euless, TX
Posts: 614
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kazfan30
I totally agree... ive put 643hp through a built 60e and ran 11s on a stock 60e before i lost 3/4 clutches.. I personally HATE an 80e gearing and the power it saps.. Yes it stronger but most dont need it!! I hear all the time... "I killed my 60e when my truck was stock!" Well...if you are tearing up trannys on stock or mild setups then look in the mirror.. you FOUND the problem.
Who cares why it failed, the 60Es are WEAK POS transmissions. The 80E only saps slightly more power than a 60E and once rolling I never noticed a difference in mine. The engine LOVES staying higher in the powerband on the 1-2 and 2-3 shifts with the 4L80E. Gear ratios in the 80E can be changed far more cheaply than a $6,000 "BUILT" 4L60E and you get a MUCH STRONGER transmission out of the upgrade. Not to mention the clutch to clutch shifting is much more aggressive feeling than the band in the 4L60E could be.

Stock 350 in a non aggressively driven application killed a 4L60E in 38K miles.
Old 02-29-2016, 04:39 PM
  #19  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (18)
 
kazfan30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fast355
Who cares why it failed, the 60Es are WEAK POS transmissions. The 80E only saps slightly more power than a 60E and once rolling I never noticed a difference in mine. The engine LOVES staying higher in the powerband on the 1-2 and 2-3 shifts with the 4L80E. Gear ratios in the 80E can be changed far more cheaply than a $6,000 "BUILT" 4L60E and you get a MUCH STRONGER transmission out of the upgrade. Not to mention the clutch to clutch shifting is much more aggressive feeling than the band in the 4L60E could be.

Stock 350 in a non aggressively driven application killed a 4L60E in 38K miles.
yeah you right...had a 9 sec F body on a 60e... a 10 sec F body on a 60e... and a full weight RCSB in 11s on a stock 60e... POS indeed! Its my opinion man, and ive had Tons of success on a 60e and not EVEN CLOSE TO 6k...not too mention the MANY MANY TBSS guys running quick times on a 4l70e transmissions. Point im trying to make is you can TEAR UP ANYTHING if you drive it like crap and beat it..

Last edited by kazfan30; 02-29-2016 at 04:48 PM.
Old 02-29-2016, 05:10 PM
  #20  
Moderator
iTrader: (19)
 
TXsilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Humble Texas
Posts: 18,318
Received 226 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

I have an 80e in my Silverado and Camaro...and multiple 60e transmissions in past projects. I can definitely say that I prefer the driving characteristics of the 60e. it's just so soggy down low with an 80e. is it stronger? no doubt. is it necessary? not most times IMO. personal preferences I guess.


Quick Reply: Do I really need a 4l80e?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 PM.