Geolander at II, Bridgestone AT, or Revos
09-26-2006, 02:59 PM
#1
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Geolander at II, Bridgestone AT, or Revos
Down to these 3 tires. Need something kind of aggresssive but not a mud tire.
Geolanders are $111 ea
Bridgestone AT are $123 ea
Bridgestone Revos are $141 ea
I m leaning towards the Geolanders but I m reading mixed reviews. Tread wear being the biggest complaint.
Any help is appreciated. Tire size is 265/70/17
Geolanders are $111 ea
Bridgestone AT are $123 ea
Bridgestone Revos are $141 ea
I m leaning towards the Geolanders but I m reading mixed reviews. Tread wear being the biggest complaint.
Any help is appreciated. Tire size is 265/70/17
09-26-2006, 04:07 PM
#2
Teching In
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have the Geolanders in 285/75/16 with about 20k on them I rotate every 5k and they look just like the day they were put on. I would buy another set tomm if I had to. No experience with the others but I was also choosing between revos and geos when I went with the geos.
09-26-2006, 04:16 PM
#3
Teching In
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have the A/T revos on my Z-71 Suburban and love them for florida conditions like sand, wet weather traction and no noise on the road . Theses tires are a soft compond rubber so match them to your conditions.
09-26-2006, 04:25 PM
#4
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The ATs have a $50 rebate and the Revos have a $75 rebate, so price is going to be pretty close.
I go to the mountains alot to ride atvs and I m on some dirt/gravel roads and snow and ice in the winter. So, traction is a must. The stock tires are a bridgestone and they suck. I cant even drive in my yard after a rain without them spinning.
How do the Geolanders look? Do they look aggressive when mounted? Wife has the revos on her Jeep and she loves em.
I go to the mountains alot to ride atvs and I m on some dirt/gravel roads and snow and ice in the winter. So, traction is a must. The stock tires are a bridgestone and they suck. I cant even drive in my yard after a rain without them spinning.
How do the Geolanders look? Do they look aggressive when mounted? Wife has the revos on her Jeep and she loves em.
09-26-2006, 04:51 PM
#5
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i had the A/T's on my last truck and loved them, great in wet weater, couple time i would be going 80 mph in the rain, hit a thing of water and no hydropaining. plus i loved the look of them, real arrgessive form the side. but my next tires will be the revos bec they don't make the a/t's in a 285/70/17. also my aunt had the geolanders on here montero sport, horrible tires, wore really bad.
here they are on my last truck:
here they are on my last truck:
09-26-2006, 05:36 PM
#6
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Crystal Springs, MS
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
we run the Revos on our work trucks... they last forever.. we have gotten 80k miles out of a set before they were replaced, then they went on a 1500HD and have gotten 25k miles out of them.... still driveable with treads left..
Trending Topics
09-26-2006, 11:40 PM
#10
Yes, grille guards are the **** when you're doing the smashing 
$1400 worth of damage to a Maxima, not a scratch on my truck (when I had the Smittybilt grille guard on). Almost totaled a Volvo with my old Suburban, just had to scrape his paint off my grille guard and I was good to go
$1400 worth of damage to a Maxima, not a scratch on my truck (when I had the Smittybilt grille guard on). Almost totaled a Volvo with my old Suburban, just had to scrape his paint off my grille guard and I was good to go
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
