Notices
GM Drivetrain & Suspension Chassis | Transmission| Driveshaft | Gears/Rear End/Differential | Traction Aids

How to prevent this.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-2014, 10:03 AM
  #31  
DrX
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
DrX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
So is that a slip yoke on the end of the shaft with a fixed end on the pinion gear? What does the transmission side look like? Fixed?
Regular pinion yoke(can be upgraded to a 1410), then slip yoke in the shaft. Trans end will be a slide on yoke with a bolt through the end into the shaft. My current trans actually has that style of output shaft and that is why I had to have the slip yoke bored to make it work. Probably also why I needed a puller to get the thing off the other day. https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...-shaft-521731/
Old 08-01-2014, 11:19 AM
  #32  
11 Second Hall Moniter
iTrader: (22)
 
AKlowriderZ71's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,651
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Dr X, are your stock control arms boxed? Have the bushings all been replaced with polyurethane or polygraphite pieces? If not, that's where I would start. With your power to weight ratio, and traction with slicks, you are getting a ton of deflection in all of these parts.

And for the same reasons, I also agree with the other posters here about u-bolt yokes instead of strap style, and a fixed yoke on the trans.
Old 08-01-2014, 12:25 PM
  #33  
DrX
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
DrX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AKlowriderZ71
Dr X, are your stock control arms boxed? Have the bushings all been replaced with polyurethane or polygraphite pieces? If not, that's where I would start. With your power to weight ratio, and traction with slicks, you are getting a ton of deflection in all of these parts.

And for the same reasons, I also agree with the other posters here about u-bolt yokes instead of strap style, and a fixed yoke on the trans.
Driveshaft Specialist recommended sticking with 5" aluminum with a slip yoke on the trans vs a 4" steel splined shaft.

Received these today:

Name:  LCA_zpsa76c90de.jpg
Views: 56
Size:  53.7 KB

Name:  yoke4_zps5763ef55.jpg
Views: 47
Size:  109.3 KB
Old 08-01-2014, 12:53 PM
  #34  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
axisT6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: League City, Texas
Posts: 383
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Reasons for aluminum recommendation?? Max speed maybe??
Old 08-01-2014, 01:28 PM
  #35  
I have a gauge for that
iTrader: (42)
 
Atomic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 16,261
Received 391 Likes on 261 Posts
Default

The bigger diameter probably makes up for the material weakness in terms of strength and critical speed.
Old 08-01-2014, 02:24 PM
  #36  
DrX
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
DrX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by axisT6
Reasons for aluminum recommendation?? Max speed maybe??
"I don't see any benefit in going to a bolt on yoke and then a heavy 4 inch steel shaft with a spline stub and slip either.The 5.0 Alum has more torque rating than the 4.0 steel. I don't remember your gear ration but if deep gears critical speed could be an issue also."

I believe critical speed for the Al was around 7000, not that it would get that high at the track in 3rd. Looks like I was trapping around 5500, which I think is about where the CS was for 4" steel.
Old 08-01-2014, 05:22 PM
  #37  
DrX
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
DrX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Just noticed this....

Name:  transmount_zps693be374.jpg
Views: 71
Size:  195.8 KB
Old 08-01-2014, 08:22 PM
  #38  
Custm2500's Rude Friend
iTrader: (17)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 14,382
Received 786 Likes on 652 Posts
Default

That looks like a weak aftermarket mount.


Anchor Brand - made in Korea

I would replace with a poly unit
Old 08-01-2014, 10:59 PM
  #39  
DrX
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
DrX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1FastBrick
That looks like a weak aftermarket mount.


Anchor Brand - made in Korea

I would replace with a poly unit
I have been looking but comments on tech re poly mounts seem to be almost 100% negative??? Think I have asked previously on here as well.

Also....anyone running a poly trans mount with GM engine mounts?
Old 08-02-2014, 12:38 PM
  #40  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
axisT6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: League City, Texas
Posts: 383
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Atomic
The bigger diameter probably makes up for the material weakness in terms of strength and critical speed.
Diameter is key. Given that the moment of inertia of tubular sections takes diameter to the power of 4, any increase in diameter has dramatic increase in stiffness.


Quick Reply: How to prevent this.....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 PM.