Notices
GM Drivetrain & Suspension Chassis | Transmission| Driveshaft | Gears/Rear End/Differential | Traction Aids

Picking a new rear end gear.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2010, 10:54 AM
  #11  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
SimpleGreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 49
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fastnblu
3.23s are indeed for help meeting CAFE. As for 4.10s not hurtin mileage, I don't believe that for a second. If a truck previously had 3.73s, a swap to 4.10s might not hurt MPG. But a jump from 3.23 to 4.10? Really? I'm sure it'll **** & get like never before, but cmon. Why doesn't GM put 4.10s in all their trucks then? Answer in red.

Results are gonna vary in terms of MPG, whether some gain or lose. That & efficiency are tied in many factors. It's no 1 size fits all blanket statement. In no order, driving habits, tune, cam, convertor & gear all tie into the where's it most efficient/ MPG as far as I'm concerned.

True (on the efficiency statement). But this truck is remaining realistically stock (well no internal engine mods or converter). I just figured if anything the 3.23s were hurting it. I guess they may be beneficial if you just drive on the interstate at 70 MPH forever.

I will agree too that 4.10s would be an extreme step though.

According to my RPM calculator 4.10 is right at 2200 RPM at 70...but 3.73 is 2000RPM.

I dunno. I guess Id have to bite the bullet and find out myself
Old 04-04-2010, 11:18 AM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
fastnblu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Let us know what u go w/. I'm curious as to what u choose & your results as far as MPG. I've no doubt you'll like the extra pep. I'm partial to the 3.42s, but if I had anything 3.23 or smaller, I'd upgrade to 3.55 at least (if they make em for our trucks) but prolly I'd go to a 3.73 in that instance. Like I said, IDK if they offer a 3.55 at all; if anyone does, it's prolly in a aftermarket gear. I prefer if I ever upgrade to 3.73, to use OEM or I hear good things bout Yukon.

Some guys like a lower numerically if goin turbo or F/I.

Last edited by fastnblu; 04-04-2010 at 11:25 AM.
Old 04-04-2010, 01:32 PM
  #13  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
SimpleGreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 49
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fastnblu
Let us know what u go w/. I'm curious as to what u choose & your results as far as MPG. I've no doubt you'll like the extra pep. I'm partial to the 3.42s, but if I had anything 3.23 or smaller, I'd upgrade to 3.55 at least (if they make em for our trucks) but prolly I'd go to a 3.73 in that instance. Like I said, IDK if they offer a 3.55 at all; if anyone does, it's prolly in a aftermarket gear. I prefer if I ever upgrade to 3.73, to use OEM or I hear good things bout Yukon.

Some guys like a lower numerically if goin turbo or F/I.
It probably wont be for a while yet. I dont have $800 to spend on the gear set, Tru Trac, and installation right now.

I think in such a heavy truck with my size tires it could only be beneficial.
Old 04-04-2010, 03:19 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
 
james8997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: louisiana
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

ill do it for cheaper
Old 04-05-2010, 11:10 AM
  #15  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
axisT6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: League City, Texas
Posts: 383
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

You said your tires measure 31” tall. From my experience, a 3.73 gear with that tire size will give you the best all around performance. You could take this a step further. Find out what RPM the engine makes the most torque, and then select a gear that will allow you to be at or near said RPM at highway speeds.

Example:

Tire Height – 31”
Axle Ratio - 3.73
Trans OD Ratio – 0.70

Target HWY Speed – 70 mph

Now for the math:

70 mph = 73920 ipm (inches per minute)

31” tire dia. = 97.34” circumference

73920 ipm/97.34” circumference = 814.8 tire rpms

814.8 tire rpms*3.73 axle ratio = 3039.5 driveshaft rpms

3039.5 driveshaft rpms * 0.70 trans OD ratio = 2127.6 engine RPMs.

So with a 31” tire, 3.73 axle ratio, and a 4L60E trans, you will get the best MPG at 70 MPH with an engine torque peak around 2127 RPMS (+/- 200-300 rpms).

Of course you need to factor other things like vehicle weight, weight of cargo etc., but you get the picture.

Last edited by axisT6; 04-06-2010 at 07:31 AM.
Old 04-05-2010, 08:21 PM
  #16  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
SimpleGreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 49
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Ahh, that's some good info. Thanks!

I'm going to calculate my gas mileage on a long trip hopefully soon and see what I'm working with as a base line. Like I stated, I figure if the 3.73s don't make too drastic a change in MPG then it sounds like a plan to me
Old 04-09-2010, 01:46 AM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
pasadenaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Pasadena, COnroe
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

SImpleGreen. I am verifying it but I went from 15-16mpg to 19.11mpg by going from 342 1 legger to tru trac 373. I went 411 miles on 21.5 gallons.

I am breaking in my rear so I am just driving cruise control 90% of the time.
100 miles to go to complete the rear end.
Old 04-09-2010, 05:05 AM
  #18  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
lady3bglover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Alvin, Texas
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pasadenaman
I just went fro 342 to 373 + truc track. Once I break it in, Ill give you an update. My co-worker has posi 373 on his 05 'burban and it hauls ***. IT accelerates fast from 0mph. He drives it like a Sports car some times but I like how his accelerates.


Check out this thread on gear selection and install
I knew this looked a little familiar. Brian installed the TruTrac and Yukon 4.10's and I love it. But I'm also on a bigger wheel... 20's.

Originally Posted by axisT6
You said your tires measure 31” tall. From my experience, a 3.73 gear with that tire size will give you the best all around performance. You could take this a step further. Find out what RPM the engine makes the most torque, and then select a gear that will allow you to be at or near said RPM at highway speeds.

Example:

Tire Height – 31”
Axle Ratio - 3.73
Trans OD Ratio – 0.70

Target HWY Speed – 70 mph

Now for the math:

70 mph = 73920 ipm (inches per minute)

31” tire dia. = 97.34” circumference

73920 ipm/97.34” circumference = 814.8 tire rpms

814.8 tire rpms*3.73 axle ratio = 3039.5 driveshaft rpms

3039.5 driveshaft rpms * 0.70 trans OD ratio = 2127.6 engine RPMs.

So with a 31” tire, 3.73 axle ratio, and a 4L60E trans, you will get the best MPG at 70 MPH with an engine torque peak around 2127 RPMS (+/- 200-300 rpms).

Of course you need to factor other things like vehicle weight, weight of cargo etc., but you get the picture.
Brian really? You think he's going to stay at 70mph? Ha, like I did.
Old 04-10-2010, 04:33 PM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
fastnblu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by axisT6
You said your tires measure 31” tall. From my experience, a 3.73 gear with that tire size will give you the best all around performance. You could take this a step further. Find out what RPM the engine makes the most torque, and then select a gear that will allow you to be at or near said RPM at highway speeds.

Example:

Tire Height – 31”
Axle Ratio - 3.73
Trans OD Ratio – 0.70

Target HWY Speed – 70 mph

Now for the math:

70 mph = 73920 ipm (inches per minute)

31” tire dia. = 97.34” circumference

73920 ipm/97.34” circumference = 814.8 tire rpms

814.8 tire rpms*3.73 axle ratio = 3039.5 driveshaft rpms

3039.5 driveshaft rpms * 0.70 trans OD ratio = 2127.6 engine RPMs.

So with a 31” tire, 3.73 axle ratio, and a 4L60E trans, you will get the best MPG at 70 MPH with an engine torque peak around 2127 RPMS (+/- 200-300 rpms).

Of course you need to factor other things like vehicle weight, weight of cargo etc., but you get the picture.
Good stuff.

Originally Posted by pasadenaman
SimpleGreen. I am verifying it but I went from 15-16mpg to 19.11mpg by going from 342 1 legger to tru trac 373. I went 411 miles on 21.5 gallons.

I am breaking in my rear so I am just driving cruise control 90% of the time.
100 miles to go to complete the rear end.
U went from 15/16 to 19 w/. just by a going to a 3.73/ TT, and both numbers are HWY? So 100 miles more, & it's completely broke-in, ready to beat on it?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pjb1972
New Members
2
09-17-2015 02:06 PM
Oobray
SHOW & SHINE DISCUSSION
7
08-12-2015 10:56 AM
So.cal Wrk Sled
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
2
07-26-2015 12:10 AM
Ketis
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
6
07-23-2015 12:37 PM



Quick Reply: Picking a new rear end gear.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 AM.