GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

**SOUND CLIPS** Stainless Works Silverado SS Headers and Exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-08-2006 | 12:12 PM
  #1  
stainlessguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Post **SOUND CLIPS** Stainless Works Silverado SS Headers and Exhaust

Attention All Silverado SS and GM Full Size Truck Owners!

I'm Rick from Stainless Works in Chagrin Falls, Ohio. We are pleased to announce the release of our BRAND NEW Mandrel Bent 304 Stainless Steel full system (headers/catback) for the Silverado SS! We are currently the ONLY company to produce stainless headers and true dual exhaust for this ground pounding "Super Truck"! I have included two links to some sound clips of a Silverado with our full system (headers, cats, and true duals catback) pulling out of our shop below for your viewing/listening pleasure and I think you will agree that this system sounds AWESOME!!! Also no dyno pulls with this system yet but here is a list of peak HP and TQ gains on different cars and trucks with our full systems and a tune. Check us out at www.stainlessworks.net" target="_blank">http://<span style="color:Blue">www....rks.net</span> for more products and sound clips of our performance stainless steel exhaust systems!

2006 Trailblazer SS - 36.8 AWD hp and 38.8 AWD ft. lbs. (Extremely Close to the Silverado Platform)
2006 GTO - 52.83hp and 53.37 ft.lb @ 5200 RPM OH YEA! Thats Right --->
2005 Cadillac CTSV - 47.4hp and 53.2 ft lb. 5900 RPM (Yes we make one for the Caddy )
97-04 Corvette - 31.83hp and 29.72 ft.lb @ 6000 RPM
03-04 Mustang Cobra - 57.5hp and 53 ft.lb. @ 6000 RPM

SOUND CLIPS

Listen to the "Silverado SS Drive By" and "Silverado SS Idle" videos in the links below. *Requires Windows Media Player. Also check out some pics of this awesome system at the bottom of this post.

Trailblazer SS Drive by http://media.putfile.com/Silverado-Acceleration
Trailblazer SS Idle http://media.putfile.com/Silverado-Idle-and-Rev

Click Photos to Enlarge



Here's the Retail Price on the components:

Part No.
Discription
Price

HEADERS

CT6.0OR
2003-2006 Chevy/GMC 6.0L Truck. 1 3/4" CNC Mandrel Bent 304 s/s primaries, 3/8" thick CNC Laser cut flanges, 2 1/2" off road pipes. Connects to factory exhaust connections for easy installation. FITS 4WD ONLY
$991.15 + $30-$40 Shipping

CT6.0
2003-2006 Chevy/GMC 6.0L Truck 1 3/4" CNC Mandrel Bent primaries, 3/8" thick CNC Laser cut flanges, 2 1/2" y pipe with high flow cats. Connects to factory exhaust connections for easy installation. FITS 4WD ONLY.
$1321.90 + $30-$40 Shipping

CATBACK EXHAUST

CT9806
98-06 Chevy/GMC 2wd/4wd extended cab, short bed (144" W.B.) exhaust system. CNC Mandrel Bent 2 1/2" 304 stainless cat back system. Bolts up to the factory slip joint and two bolt flange. Includes dual turbo straight through mufflers. Exits one on each side of Reese style hitch-will require removal of spare tire. Dual 4" body angle cut rolled edge tips.
$770.65 + $30-$40 Shipping

CT9806CT
98-06 Chevy/GMC 2wd/4wd extended cab, short bed (144" W.B.) exhaust system. CNC Mandrel Bent 2 1/2" 304 stainless cat back system. Bolts up to the factory slip joint and two bolt flange. Includes dual chambered turbo mufflers. Exits one on each side of Reese style hitch-will require removal of spare tire. Dual 4" body angle cut rolled edge tips.
$770.65 + $30-$40 Shipping

CT9806SE
98-06 Chevy/GMC 2wd/4wd extended cab, short bed (144" W.B.) exhaust system. CNC Mandrel Bent 2 1/2" 304 stainless cat back system. Bolts up to the factory slip joint and two bolt flange. Includes dual turbo straight through mufflers. Exits behind rear tires. Dual 4" body angle cut rolled edge tips.
$770.65 + $30-$40 Shipping

CT9806SECT
98-06 Chevy/GMC 2wd/4wd extended cab, short bed (144" W.B.) exhaust system. CNC Mandrel Bent 2 1/2" 304 stainless cat back system. Bolts up to the factory slip joint and two bolt flange. Includes dual chambered turbo mufflers. Exits behind rear tires. Dual 4" body angle cut rolled edge tips.
$770.65 + $30-$40 Shipping

CALL STAINLESS WORKS AT 1-800-878-3635
ASK FOR RICK

Regards,
Rick Conway
Stainless Works
Sales and Tech.
Old 11-08-2006 | 04:13 PM
  #2  
Quik's Avatar
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

can you make LTs for a 2wd with 3" collectors and 1 7/8 primaries?
Old 11-08-2006 | 05:20 PM
  #3  
fdkss03's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default

send me a pm... I am interested in this exhaust but want it to exit the rear like the SLP exhaust does, on the corners
Old 11-09-2006 | 10:10 AM
  #4  
stainlessguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Post Primary Tube Size Question

Originally Posted by Quik
can you make LTs for a 2wd with 3" collectors and 1 7/8 primaries?
Quick,

We haven't yet built a set of headers for the 6.0L trucks with a 1 7/8" primary tube. 1 3/4" should be sufficient all of the way up to around 600 RWHP. Also considering the weight of the truck, having a slightly smaller primary tube is beneficial because there is more back pressure and more torque is created to get the heavy truck moving. We only make a large primary tube header for lighter 6.0L cars like the C6 Vette and Z06. Even for a supercharged application a 1 3/4" primary header on a 6.0L is suitable... we have 03'-04' 4.6L supercharged mustang Cobras making 600 RWHP using our 1 5/8" header just to give you an idea. There is a science to building headers that goes far beyond just flow alone and bigger isn't always better. Check out www.headerdesign.com for more info on how headers actually work to make you more power.

Regards,
Rick Conway
Stainless Works
Sales/Tech.
Old 11-09-2006 | 10:56 AM
  #5  
Moddoo's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 880
Likes: 1
From: Forest Lake, MN
Default


having a slightly smaller primary tube is beneficial because there is more back pressure
You may want to edit that sentence when you get a chance.

Last edited by Moddoo; 11-09-2006 at 11:09 AM.
Old 11-09-2006 | 03:28 PM
  #6  
stainlessguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default ...

No... that is correct. Having good flow and still having some back pressure is beneficial with a heavy vehicle because it creates more low end torque. Dramatically oversizing your exhaust system/headers (or even your intake tract for that matter) can actually have a detrimental effect on performance. This is the reason that we chose to use a 1 3/4" primary tube on both the Silverado and Trailblazer SS systems and a 1 7/8" and 2" on the C6 and ZO6.

Rick
Old 11-09-2006 | 03:57 PM
  #7  
Moddoo's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 880
Likes: 1
From: Forest Lake, MN
Default

OK, first, I am not an expert.

From your headerdesign site:

  1. Primary header pipes must be small enough to maintain the strength of the compression waves and suction waves in the pipes.
  2. Primary header pipes must be large enough to allow optimal flow of gases past the exhaust valve, and down the header pipes.
  3. Primary header pipes must be of proper length to ensure correct arrival time of the scavenging wave that will be reflected back to the exhaust valve.
  4. Collector must be of proper diameter and length to provide the correct duration and intensity of the scavenging wave.
  5. Primary header pipes and collectors must produce a scavenging wave that is present at the exhaust valve during the valve overlap period over an established operating RPM range for the engine.
I know what you are trying to say, but "scavenging" is the goal of proper primary size, not "backpressure"

Anyway, not trying get off topic.

The products look and sound good.

Lets see the dyno #s or track times.

PS. that SSS looks familiar, is the owner a member on this site?
creederado

Last edited by Moddoo; 11-09-2006 at 04:06 PM.
Old 11-09-2006 | 04:19 PM
  #8  
Quik's Avatar
5 year bitches!
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Default

Originally Posted by stainlessguy


Quick,

We haven't yet built a set of headers for the 6.0L trucks with a 1 7/8" primary tube. 1 3/4" should be sufficient all of the way up to around 600 RWHP. Also considering the weight of the truck, having a slightly smaller primary tube is beneficial because there is more back pressure and more torque is created to get the heavy truck moving. We only make a large primary tube header for lighter 6.0L cars like the C6 Vette and Z06. Even for a supercharged application a 1 3/4" primary header on a 6.0L is suitable... we have 03'-04' 4.6L supercharged mustang Cobras making 600 RWHP using our 1 5/8" header just to give you an idea. There is a science to building headers that goes far beyond just flow alone and bigger isn't always better. Check out www.headerdesign.com for more info on how headers actually work to make you more power.

Regards,
Rick Conway
Stainless Works
Sales/Tech.
and again thats why i asked for 1 7/8s i wont have a 6.0 over winter i need it for my 7200 rpm turning 408. i need to flow so i need the tube size....if you can make them ill give you guys money if not ill get them custom
Old 11-09-2006 | 05:17 PM
  #9  
stainlessguy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default I see what you're getting at...

Ok, gotcha... you are precisely right and for you larger motor 1 7/8" would work best... ( also I didn't know that you had read the header design site).

If you are local to Cleveland we can build custom headers for you. Give us a call @ 800-878-3635.

I'm glad that you did because not many people know that headers can do THAT much. You are absolutely correct. These are all design aspects that we incorporate into our header but keep in mind that these processes that they are talking about are at an emperical level. As a general rule, because everyone's motor will be different from the factory and everyone will mod their engine different my statement was a just a generalization. As a rule more low end torque will be observed with a smaller primary tube (to a certain degree-- obviously) ... but the ultimate goal is to achieve all the things that you mentioned. These things as I'll explain are very seldom (if ever) tuned into perfect harmony on a street car.

In a factory motor the flow through each port and the AFR in each cylinder will be can vary significantly so that pulse wave in each primary tube will not be timed correctly to take full advantage of a properly designed header... especially at high RPM (not to mention from engine to engine). Stock car builders can have 500+ hours in cylinder head work (valve depth, porting, etc.) to get each cylinder to match the others PERFECTLY. For this reason it's mostly a myth that equal length headers on a street car will make you more power; because nothing else is equal.

We incorporate all that you read into each header but for a factory produced car used in non-competition driving we have to use the dyno and the track to tell us what works best for most cars. On 6.0L small blocks under 500hp the 1 3/4" seems to create the best performance.

Tell all you buddies to check out that site as well!!!

Thanks,
Rick Conway
Stainless Works
Sales and Tech.
Old 11-10-2006 | 12:43 AM
  #10  
jakebdb56's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

those clips sound very nice, is the truck tuned? just curious.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 AM.