100mm MAF for LSX
#1
5 year bitches!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
100mm MAF for LSX
100mm MAF for LSX
see im running into an issue with my new duct work being 4" to fit the 90mmtb and that the stock maf is 75mm which is small and a restriction. i was going to go SD but found this. this might just be the ticket
SD is a good tune but can be dangerous, and this will still be in the lines of a MAF tune
see im running into an issue with my new duct work being 4" to fit the 90mmtb and that the stock maf is 75mm which is small and a restriction. i was going to go SD but found this. this might just be the ticket
SD is a good tune but can be dangerous, and this will still be in the lines of a MAF tune
Last edited by moregrip; 11-25-2006 at 11:50 AM.
#2
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wouldn't call SD dangerous... unless you were running off an untuned VE table with both OL and CL disabled. If this were my setup, I'd save the money on the MAF and spend it somewhere else.
Also, the link didn't work.
Also, the link didn't work.
#4
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Texas where Bigger is Better
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Quik
100mm MAF for LSX
see im running into an issue with my new duct work being 4" to fit the 90mmtb and that the stock maf is 75mm which is small and a restriction. i was going to go SD but found this. this might just be the ticket
SD is a good tune but can be dangerous, and this will still be in the lines of a MAF tune
see im running into an issue with my new duct work being 4" to fit the 90mmtb and that the stock maf is 75mm which is small and a restriction. i was going to go SD but found this. this might just be the ticket
SD is a good tune but can be dangerous, and this will still be in the lines of a MAF tune
My only concern would be how well or accurate is this device. As well as the longevity of it. I have witnessed a bunch of eratic behavior from aftermarket MAF'S before.
Last edited by moregrip; 11-25-2006 at 11:50 AM.
#5
5 year bitches!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
yea thats my concern also, this will ponder in my mind for a while. and LPE is a good company so it should be on unlike the SLP one and the grantelli junk.
#7
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: mt.pleasant pa 15666
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TurboBerserker
The big question is when does that one max out? The ad says they used it on the 725hp twin vette, but no hint of max flow.
Can't remember exactly what your plans are Quik, but was thinking a lot of boost?
Can't remember exactly what your plans are Quik, but was thinking a lot of boost?
turbo was out of his budget
Trending Topics
#10
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Texas where Bigger is Better
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mater
Quik is going NA. 408 with the L92/L76/ 90 mm tb 1 7/8 headers with svo 42 injectors and a 4" air intake with a healty size cam, hoping to see 7k rpms
turbo was out of his budget
turbo was out of his budget
I am in no way knocking SD tuning, I am in SD now but evertime the weather changes your ve calculations are off. Plus the mathmatics for figuring the MAF is much more precise with a faster sampling rate (record the waves on a lab scope & play them back). If speed density only was the way to go
then i find it hard to believe GM would not have gone to MAF+SD.